2013 - 2016 V8 Mustang vs Camaro? Same prices, I love them both

[southkogs]

About 60-80K for the conversion plus the cost of the vehicle.

Wasn't talking money at all. I'm the cheapskate with a '92 4CYL

 

[tphoyt]

No I have no Like of the Mach Mustangs, to me they look like Fecal Matter.
As for Pontiac, I have always thought they were the Ugliest of the GM Lines. I especially HATE the Grand Prix. The Only Pontiac that I liked was the 1967, and that was because of the Front End and Tail Lights of that Year.
As for Chargers and Challengers, Yeech, Horrible cheap Unibody design, the Worst being that One with what looked like a Carrying Handle for a Giant...
I like the RWD Caddies of the late 70s thru 92. I currently have a 96 Caddy RWD Fleetwood with about 16,000 on the Odometer, and an XT5.
Newer Caddies, while small, and with crummy little Seats that have less Cushioning than a Concrete Park Bench, do have a nice Chiseled Look to the Body
I also have no use for Berlin Buicks(BMW, Audi, Porshe, VW), Kraut Cadillacs(Mercedes), or any other Import.

My grandma had a caddy 72 I think. That thing was like flying on a cloud. Such a sweet ride. And fast as hell too. I want say it had 472 in it. . Granny was always yelling get out the way ya old bat as she started to pass.

 

[ezbtr]

View attachment 401407
Old School Mustang. Cheap. Easy to mod. Fast (well ^^^ not that one )

Mustang (excluding special editions) has never really been the overall winner of too much. But, generally dollar for pound they're kinda' a good deal for a muscle car. // I kinda' pick muscle cars by year more than manufacturer. I like the Camaro from the 1990s more than the newer ones (for example).

 

[ezbtr]

Love the Fox body!!!!

 

[ezbtr]

The new to me 2017 Mustang GT 5.0

 

[ezbtr]

The extra minimum 140 extra horsepower is amazing on the 2017 - versus my 2006 w/73K orig miles, , new AC , minor stuff, although I’m still stuck on the body styles of the 05 through 09 Mustang GT’s especially mine because it has the wing and all that good stuff Lowered dropped just enough not too much. It’s perfect for me, it'll do 145. It just didn’t have enough. Get up and go though. I’ll get exactly what I paid for it 8 yes ago in CA in the next couple weeks.

 

[ezbtr]

The 67 and 68 Notchbacks were the Best Looking Mustangs, Ever. After that they actually looked Stupid. The 2005 - 2010 looked Okay, Inside as well as Outside. The Current Ones are Pathetic inside.

I had a 68 Fastback, hyper 289/302 25 yrs ago, Loved it wrenched on it for years had to sell, moving , son being born, my 06 prob equals it in performance, the 2017 completely blows it away