1980 crest/maurell 25'

99v92c

Cadet
Joined
Aug 8, 2022
Messages
19
Looking for help with my 1980 maurell 25' pontoon. I've lowered the 85 hp v4 evinrude as low as it'll go without drilling more holes but the engine plate well fills with water and the prop cavitates. I've noticed there is a wedge shaped metal piece between the structural rail and the transom/engine pan that kicks the plate lower in the back. Is it possible that wedged piece is pushing the engine lower than it should be? I've attached a photo of the wedged piece for reference
 

Attachments

  • 20220807_193359.jpg
    20220807_193359.jpg
    895.5 KB · Views: 9

ahicks

Captain
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
3,957
The well filling with water is normal. That wedge doesn't appear to be, but I'm not going to condemn it without seeing a little more of the whole setup, including an angle that allows us to see the position of the cavitation plate in relation to the bottom of the engine pod and pontoons.
 

99v92c

Cadet
Joined
Aug 8, 2022
Messages
19
This was when I had the engine mounted at the highest hole. This set up would cavitate much worse. Barely off idle it would cavitate
 

Attachments

  • 20220731_172319.jpg
    20220731_172319.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 8

99v92c

Cadet
Joined
Aug 8, 2022
Messages
19
With the engine mounted at the highest hole this is where the engine set in the water
 

Attachments

  • 20220804_160409.jpg
    20220804_160409.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 6

captmello

Captain
Joined
Jun 30, 2008
Messages
3,845
with pontoons, you want the motor lower. I'd drop it to the lowest position and see how it behaves. in your second pic, the motor looks too high. what prop are you using?
 

99v92c

Cadet
Joined
Aug 8, 2022
Messages
19
It is in the lowest position now and still cavitates I'll have to get more photos when I get home. It has a 13 1/4x17 prop
 

ahicks

Captain
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
3,957
It's as low as possible right now without drilling more holes in the transom board
Understood. The question remains, is that low enough? This being a 1980 boat, it appears there's a good chance that engine pod has been changed. My experience, which dates back to the era this boat was new, was that VERY few late 70's, early1980's boats had enough engine pod to carry 85hp motors. Betting it's been changed, leaving the question, did they know what they were doing?
 

captmello

Captain
Joined
Jun 30, 2008
Messages
3,845
If it were me, I would pick up a different prop, that small diameter 17p seems like a terrible choice for that boat. do you have a tach? I have a similar size boat and motor and I'm running a four blade, 13p prop that has served me well. as stated, you may be forced to rework your pod and transom in the future, but I'd switch props now. you may find it helps quite a bit.
 

99v92c

Cadet
Joined
Aug 8, 2022
Messages
19
If it were me, I would pick up a different prop, that small diameter 17p seems like a terrible choice for that boat. do you have a tach? I have a similar size boat and motor and I'm running a four blade, 13p prop that has served me well. as stated, you may be forced to rework your pod and transom in the future, but I'd switch props now. you may find it helps quite a bit.
I will definitely look into another prop. I installed an omc tach but it shows to idle at 3k so I think I was sold a faulty tach
 

captmello

Captain
Joined
Jun 30, 2008
Messages
3,845
diameter doesn't matter as much as long as it fits. I think mine is around 14.5ish.
 

99v92c

Cadet
Joined
Aug 8, 2022
Messages
19
This is how it looks with it lowered all the way down
 

Attachments

  • 20220809_161709.jpg
    20220809_161709.jpg
    950.4 KB · Views: 6

ahicks

Captain
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
3,957
This is how it looks with it lowered all the way down
You need to take that shot again about 6' - 8' further away. It's difficult to get any perspective in this one. Would be nice to get a shot showing where the engine cavitation plate height is in relation to the pontoons.

From what I see here, it's pretty high, but it's tough to see for sure. And just as an FYI, it's not at all unusual for the pod to have an inch or 2 of water in it at rest. Maybe more at low speeds/heavy loads....

Cupped props generally don't cavitate as easily.
 

ahicks

Captain
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
3,957
Sure, that's great. From that pic, it LOOKS like height should be OK, but it's certainly not too low.
 

99v92c

Cadet
Joined
Aug 8, 2022
Messages
19
I might have to try to get it lower. The bottom of the engine pod diverts so much water when the boat gets going that you can see the top of the cavitation plate above the top of the water. So I think I need to remove that wedged piece or get the engine lower
 
Top