Correction!So yup, your OE 350 EFI motor had 260 propshaft HP, so it had around 300 at the flywheel. The reman 357 carb is rated LESS. It's 275 at the flywheel. So there's maybe 235 getting to the propeller. Not 325. See the link. https://www.mercurymarine.com/en/us/...a-sterndrives/
You were sold a smaller output engine unless there's something we don't know about it.
Scream bloody murder.
|
|
Not positive but, it says "Serial Number 2.20R 0L********"
I'm guessing that means 2.20:1
It's stamped in the drive right near the top on the port side.
And you are correct, it is a 357 Mag Bravo 4V from Mercury Remanufacturing.
It's got a identification plate on the starboard side of the engine block confirming the same, with serial#, part# etc...
Well I always thought the 350 efi motors were rated 300 crank horse power. Was your 260 rating at the prop, I bet it was. So if the 357 is 325 crankshaft horse that makes a little more sense.
I bet you need to use the shorter props to allow it to run and not get hot from lugging, also it will make more power at higher rpm, and it will holeshot better. You stated that it started doing the same thing as before when you had the 24's on. Was it weak, or overheating?
That motor can run to 5000 rpm, won't hurt a thing, but over propping it will over work it and shorten it's life.
I will take a browse through the Merc reman catalog and read up on the Merc spec cam if I can find it. I'll come back and bore you all with some tech gobbledygook if I can figure it out.
Has any one checked the fuel supply? Timing? Carburetor setup? Boat weight? Are you certain the boat isn't heavier than it used to be?
Loosing power while trying to plane if throttle advanced past 3/4.You stated that it started doing the same thing as before when you had the 24's on. Was it weak, or overheating?
Do you remember what your full throttle RPM and speed (on plane, trimmed for max speed) was with the previous engine installed?
Ayuh,..... Before ya throw away the baby with the bath water, do the test I mention in post # 19,....
Unfortunately I don't remember exactly. I know we would cruise around at 35-3800 and that was at about the same throttle position as what I am refering to now on the new engine as being 3/4.
It does have more power then before once up on plane. Just to clarify, but getting there (on plane) is certainly more labor intensive!
I have been "testing" my new 2004 Sig. 240 and think that my prop needs replacing:
Mercruiser 350 mag with Bravo III, 2:20 gear ratio.
3/4 tank gas, two people
WOT ~ 5400 rpm (manual says it should be 4800-5200)
44 mph at 5400 rpm (WOT)
28 mph at 3600 rpm
Currently have 22p props. I filled out the info at the mercruiser site and it came back with a 24p prop. This sound reasonable? What are all you 240 captains getting out of your boats and with what prop?
FWIW, I'm inclined to agree with achris here (post #10) the behavior sounds a lot like overcarburation or secondaries opening too soon. 750 cfm may be a bit much in this application. My opinion the 600 cfm carb would deliver a more usable powerband with little or no loss in WOT power.
I didn't realise it was running a 750cfm carb. Yeah, way too big. Here's a 'snip' of the Summit racing website carb CFM calculator. Ignore the 'racing' number, but look at the street value. Indicates a 600cfm is more than adequate...
![]()
Just out of curiosity has the dealer done a compression test or done a cylinder drop test? Misadjusted valves on reman motors happens all the time, and it only takes 1 tight rocker on an exhaust valve to give you a low/no compression scenario. You wouldn't have any other symptoms other than the engine feels a little wimpy. The same thing if you have 1 bad plug wire, or 1 bad plug and a cylinder isn't firing. A V8 will still run very well on 7 cylinders, and still have lots of power.... But it won't have "all" the power it should have, and feel a little wimpy.