yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

brucefrombklyn

Recruit
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
2
Is the additional cost of the four stroke yam. really worth it.? i am looking at a price difference of $12,000.00 !! for a pair. Does anybody know what percent gas milage improvement is the 4 stroke over the 2 stroke? thanks
 
D

DJ

Guest
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

Even at $2.00/gallon. That's 6,000 gallons.<br /><br />You are going to have to make the call on that one.
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

Hey, Bruce.<br /><br />If you aren't willing to pay another 12 Large for instant starts and smooth, quiet, smoke-free operation stay with the cheap ones. They work okay. :)
 

RJS

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Mar 14, 2002
Messages
211
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

It depends on what type of fuel injection you are talking about, conventional EFI or direct fuel injection. A DFI 2 stroke beats a 4 stroke in cruising gas mileage and is a better performer in terms of hole shot. If you like to troll, 4 strokes win in terms of gas mileage.
 

Forktail

Ensign
Joined
Feb 11, 2002
Messages
977
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

My Yamaha dealer up here doesn't even carry DFI's. He'll order you one if you want it, but claims they don't run well (especially start and idle) because of the colder weather/water. He's one of the largest dealers in the country, by the way.<br /><br />$12K is a lot of money for the 4's....but you get more. Start with a 3-year warranty instead of a 2-year. Worth the money if one of the 2-strokes dies on year 3. Better resale and trade in value with the 4-stroke if you ever upgrade. Then add things like a bigger alternator, etc. Chuck the oil reservoir. And which motor will last longer and give you the happiest, trouble-free service?<br /><br />It's all a matter of money my friend. If the $12K is gonna kill you, then the 2-strokes will be fine. But if you can do it, you certainly won't be sorry. You get what you pay for. :)
 
D

DJ

Guest
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

Bruce,<br /><br />I think there is A LOT of: gee wiz, cool and WOW in that $12K.
 

ruel42

Seaman Apprentice
Joined
Apr 10, 2001
Messages
30
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

I don't know if your are repowering, but the 4 strokes need to be mounted wider than the 2 because of the larger powerhead. This can also add to the cost because you will have to rework the transom.
 

Forktail

Ensign
Joined
Feb 11, 2002
Messages
977
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

djohns19; <br /><br />gee wiz = 24-valve double overhead cam without rocker arms.<br /><br />cool = ram charged manifold multiport fuel injection.<br /><br />WOW = an extra year warranty, heavier duty stuff like bigger output alternators, and a 70 degree tilt.<br /><br />Then there's the smoke-free, super quiet, super smooth, better on fuel and oil advantages. Not to mention resale value, longevity and reliability.<br /><br />Pinto's and Vega's go down the road just like the more costly BMW's, Volvo's, and Mercedes' too. But which one would you rather drive back and forth to work?<br /><br />Knot Enough, you better check your rigging specs. The new 4-strokes are a 60 degree V-6 design vs. the 2-stroke's larger 76 degree V-6 design. Exhaust runs between the V-block on the 4-stroke. They're made to fit the most popular boats in size.<br /><br />If you've got the $$ do the 4-strokes. You won't be sorry. :)
 

seahorse5

Rear Admiral
Joined
Jan 24, 2002
Messages
4,698
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

Forktail,<br /><br />The V6 Yamaha 4 strokes for dual installation need to be mounted on a minimum of 28" centers, as opposed to all other brands that use the standard 26" centers.<br /><br />Those 24 valves and twin cams on each bank make the motor wider than normal.
 

evin300

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jun 4, 2001
Messages
384
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

Lets see, that would be 52 more parts to fail on the 4-strokes, since when is overly-complicated better? <br /><br />I bet it would make a great car engine though.<br /><br />D.....F.....I Who can describe it? 4-strokers get to pass on this one, they only deal with E...F...I.
 
D

DJ

Guest
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

Forktail,<br /><br />Gee Forktail, did I hit a nerve-you a dealer?<br /><br />$12K is still A LOT of money to throw at what SOME (not necessarily me) would argue is an upgrade. I would be willing to bet that 50% of the contributors to this board do not own an entire rig worth $12K.<br /><br />The stuff you described is old technology in the automotive world.<br /><br />I never aspired to the race of having the newest/flashiest piece of machinery on the block-just the one that always ran.
 

mnmfors

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Nov 18, 2001
Messages
176
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

I have a friend that blew up a 225 merc. Before this motor blew, it ran great, pushed the boat real good and trolled well. He then went out and bought a 225 yamaha 4 stroke.<br /><br />Now the boat barely gets up on a plane with a full load. It gets good milage, and is super quiet, and it starts really easy. He has had no mechanical problems.<br /><br />He is happy with the switch, but he gives me that look on the way out into the ocean as he is playing with the trim to make it plane.<br /><br />I am no expert, but I would save the money for gas, but that is me.
 

mnmfors

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Nov 18, 2001
Messages
176
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

oh, and I believe he got less of a warranty vs. the yamaha 2 stoke, maybe he is mistaken tho...the salesman may have wanted him to buy a 2 stoke
 

Forktail

Ensign
Joined
Feb 11, 2002
Messages
977
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

I believe most boats that can handle 450 hp can accomodate the 28" centers. I'm sure there are some cases of older one's that may not. My point was that according to the rigging specs of most boats (especially new one's), 28" centers are do-able and "reworking" the transom may not be necessary.<br /><br />Even300, DFI is where fuel is drawn through a fuel pump and pressurized by a second high-speed fuel pump to extreme pressures (up to 700 psi). This high pressure fuel is then distributed to injectors that inject the fuel directly into the cylinder in fine mist. A computer and several sensors tell the injectors when to open and how long to stay open. This makes for a highly atomized fuel/air mixture, which produces more power, efficiency, and less scavenged fuel (cleaner).<br /><br />The only problem with the "52 more parts to fail" theory, is that these so called failures don't seem to be happening. The 4-strokes have proven to be extremely durable and reliable. My own experience has been that they are more durable, reliable, and long-lived than the 2's. And since I own several boats with several various outboards, guide, commercial fish, and pleasure boat, I'll take my experience for what it is.<br /><br />"Overly-complicated"?? There's nothing complicated about a fuel injected 4-stroke. At least nothing that faults them. They've been around for decades. Do you mean sophisticated?<br /><br />djohns19, sorry I'm not a dealer although I have nerves of steel :) .<br /><br />My point was that, in my opinion, the 4-stroke has more to offer. From the better warranty to the longevity. From the no oil mess to the pleasure of talking without yelling at WOT. From the resale to the low maintenance, and from the instant no-stall starts to the fuel economy. Again, in my opinion, the overall experience with a 4-stroke is unmatched. My point was that it is up to the buyer to determine if this is worth the extra money. To me it is, because I can afford it. To someone who can't afford it, it may not be....and in that case the 2-stroke would be fine.<br /><br />I always believed that "old technology in the automotive world" is a good thing. There are no other pieces of machinery that get abused like our autos. 4-strokes in autos are proven...no doubt about that. The fact that engineers are adopting all this technology on the sterns of our boats in a little package connected to a prop is truely amazing. So instead of making the analogy, "if it's good on an auto then it's bad on a boat", ask yourself why haven't 2-strokes adapted and proved themselves in autos? Why aren't we driving them around if they're so much better?<br /><br />I not only aspire to have the outboard on the block that just "always ran". I aspire to have the outboard on the block - that runs the best. :) <br /><br />mnmfors, 225 hp is 225 hp. I would guess your friend needs to try a smaller pitch prop. The new 225 will weigh more, but it shouldn't mean the difference of getting on step or not. It's odd that he is happy with it, regardless? All Yamaha 4-strokes come with a factory 3-year warranty. The 2-strokes have a 2-year warranty.<br /><br />Buy what your use and priorities allow guys. But I will say, I've never met anyone who bought a 4-stroke and wished he had saved the money for a 2-stroke instead......<br /><br /> :)
 

Franki

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Feb 16, 2002
Messages
1,059
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

Lets not do the whole "2 stroke" verses "4 stroke" thing.. its been done over and over.<br /><br />the simple truth of the mater is that a new optimax or ficht motor compares well to the four strokes in pretty much all areas.. (and slightly better in some areas.) slightly worse in others.<br /><br />Its much of a muchance.. if you have any one of these (dfi 2stk or efi 4stk), you will very likely love and endorse it to anyone that asks, (and potentially some that don't :)<br /><br />The best advice I can give you is this..<br /><br />get on a boat with the DFI 2stroke and go for a hoon.. then do the same with the 4 stroke... (try and make sure they are on similiar boats.)<br />for a sale that big, ,most places will be happy to accomodate you.<br /><br />The one that impresses you most is the one you should get.. end of story.. personal preference.<br /><br />I would love either.<br /><br />Incidently, direct injection and engine sensors are not new technology either.. <br /><br />rgds<br /><br />Frank
 

Forktail

Ensign
Joined
Feb 11, 2002
Messages
977
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

Good points Franki.<br /><br />I understood that the Optimax was on it's way out? At least that's what a couple dealers have told me. I'm one of those victims of a FICHT, but I'm sure Bombardier will straighten that out too :) .<br /><br />"Its much of a muchance.. if you have any one of these (dfi 2stk or efi 4stk), you will very likely love and endorse it to anyone that asks, (and potentially some that don't :) "<br /><br />True, unless you have several various 2-stroke and 4-strokes that you use. Here, you get an honest unbiased opinion based on actual comparison, performance, and repair history. <br /><br />I have a 40 hp 2-stroke tiller, a 40 hp 2-stroke remote, a 50 hp 4-stroke remote, three 4-stroke 9.9's, a 5 hp 2-stroke, a 6 hp 2-stroke, an old 7.5 hp 2-stroke, a 115 2-stroke, a 115 4-stroke, and a pair of counter rotating 2-stroke 150's. I even have a rare 2-stroke inboard Bombardier engine in a jet boat. Again, I guide and commercial fish in remote Alaska, as well as pleasure boat. I see no reason to buy another 2-stroke at this time. The 4's have proven themselves better for me.<br /><br />The carbed and EFI 2-strokes have been very good, and I wouldn't hesitate to buy one if weight or a few more bucks were an issue. But it'll take a while to heal from the FICHT. :)
 

Franki

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Feb 16, 2002
Messages
1,059
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

Sometimes the manufacturers have been at fault, I have heard stories like that for nearly every motor around.<br />heard bad stories about optimax, <br />heard bad stories about OMC fichts, (not bombadier though, yet to hear a bad one from them.)<br />heard stories about the end of cams snapping off suzi four strokes, heard some stories about honda 4strks as well..<br /><br />They are all engines that work on the same general principles.. (internal combustion.)<br /><br />all are capable of having mechanial failures, of having design failures, (old fichts are an example here.) and of having material failures..<br /><br />both use standards that have been around for yonks for their basic structure.. they are both only refinments of engines that have been around for 50 years...<br /><br />I still say its much of a muchance.. <br /><br />I'd say the biggest reason to chose one over the other is "which one has the better support" over the others.<br /><br />In Australia, anything with "marine" in its name somewhere is 4 times the cost.. 4 strokes are incrediably expensive over here... you have no idea how expensive.<br /><br />We have no laws at all regarding emmisions.. (except that if you create a big spill, you pay to clean it up..) and two strokes are a much cheaper.. but still expensive.<br /><br />In Australia, a 10 year old 225HP would still go for around 12000 to 15000, (multiply that by 0.58 for roughly US dollars.)<br /><br />A honda 225 four stroke goes for around 23,000 dollars AUD. not cheap, thats the price of a new family car.. (ford falcon or GMH commodore.)<br /><br />who can afford that? certainly not me...<br /><br />so again, its personal choise as dictated by your wallet, its contents, support in your area, weight, space etc...<br /><br />Don't write off the two stroke yet.. its developing fast.. and it is the more power efficient format.. (ie: max Hp per ci)it just has some issues that need to be worked around.<br />they are getting there..<br /><br />I still think that one day crankcase compression will be replaced by a basic rotary supercharger, meaning that all transfer ports can be removed, flow characteristics improved. oil in crankcase<br />for lubing duties, throw in DFI and variable exhaust expansion etc etc..<br /><br /> if they ever want to mass produce a 300-450+ HP outboat motor, they won't do it with 4 strokes. (at least not initially) it would be too heavy. but a two stroke with the above characteristics could do it... we already know that in equal tune 2 and 4 strokes of the same size the 2 stroke wins every time..<br /><br />they just need to work on improving the design.<br />Don't solely decide now, things change all the time...who knows what will be the trends??<br /><br />pretty much all failures with recent motors have been found to be a design fault..<br /><br />As is pointed out many times on this forum, the majority of outboards don't die from wearing out, they die of neglect or some accident.<br /><br />Its all about choise, and we should all be delighted that we have that.<br /><br />having said that, if I was looking for a 10-70 HP outboard and cost wasnt' an option, I'd probably go a fourstroke, if I was looking for a 225hp, I'd start by looking at the new fichts.<br /><br />regards<br /><br />Frank
 

evin300

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jun 4, 2001
Messages
384
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

Wow! nice posts. Forktail, the car engine four strokes live "Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous" compared to what a marine engine has to do.<br /><br />Please drop in during the year 2030 and tell me about the 4-stroke longevity issue, see ya later!
 

Forktail

Ensign
Joined
Feb 11, 2002
Messages
977
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

Good pionts Franki. I would only add that as 2-stroke outboard technology advances, so will the 4-stroke outboard technology. I see 4-strokes with camless designs incorporating hydraulic-electric valve actuation in the future. It's already successfully tested in the 4-stroke diesel market. Isn't competition good!<br /><br />Even300...."Rich and Famous"? Hardly. Autos are used by every ignorant person ever to live. Clutch, shift, brake, up hill, down hill, pull, stop, rev, idle, sub-zero starts, tripple digit temps, hook up the RV, race, off-road, maintenance neglect, oops forgot to change the oil and air filter gig. And do it all again day in and day out....by the millions. Then there's the industrial and commercial rigs.......<br /><br />Unless it's extremely rough out, my 4-stroke outboards run at a nice constant cruising rpm for much of their life. Maybe you're talking about corrosion?<br /><br />Year 2030? Thats only 28 years from now. I know of an old blue and white 7.5 hp Honda 4-stroke made in the 70's that's still going strong. :)
 

evin300

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jun 4, 2001
Messages
384
Re: yamaha 225 efi 2 stroke vs. 225 4 stroke

Nope, not about corrosion Forky, You are missin a big something still, sorry, I dont have time to go into it again tonight, later :)
 
Top