Why an increase in engine horsepower will hurt your ‘holeshot’, acceleration and midrange cruising.

achris

More fish than mountain goat
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
27,468
So you want more horsepower, who doesn’t? But this is why an increase in top end power is actually a very bad idea in a boat.

You’re off shopping for more horsepower. You buy a set of higher compression pistons, a ‘lumpier’ camshaft, a set of roller lifters and higher ratio roller rockers, better valve springs, and a bigger carb to feed the beast.

You spend many dollars on getting the block machined and maybe even splash for a new set of vortec heads. If not the vortec, you have the old heads machined, ported and polished, and a single plane manifold to squeeze out the last horsepower that engine can produce.

You’ve assembled the engine with all the meticulous care and cleanliness you could muster, and now it’s in the boat. The drive is on and you have to select a propeller. And here’s where reality takes a great big bite.

Engine power is a trade-off. For a given engine capacity, without adding forced induction, increasing the maximum output usually entails 2 things. Firstly, that extra power comes on at a higher rpm. Secondly, that extra top end horsepower is at the cost of low- and mid-range horsepower. Ultimately you have produced an engine with a SMALLER usable rev range. Not only that, because there is SO much power at the top end, you need to increase the propeller pitch to keep the maximum revs in check, and that adds more load to the engine throughout the entire rev range, not just at the top. So now you have an engine producing LESS power low- and mid-range, but being asked to push a bigger (more pitch) propeller.

So, ignoring all that, you change the prop from a 17” to a 21”, because that’s what the calculations say the engine will need to inhibit over-revving. Let’s go back and ask why you wanted more power… Because the boat wasn’t getting out of the water quick enough, or you wanted to reduce the mid-range cruising revs.

So there you are with your shiny new high power mill ticking away. Everything sounds great, and you drop it into gear. The boat starts moving and you, with a massive smile on your face, drop the hammer. With all that extra horsepower you’re expecting it to launch like a Polaris missile. As the engine struggles up to 3,000rpm far slower than it ever did before, you’re wondering what you did wrong. Where did you mess up? Is the timing out, is there not enough advance, maybe the fuel mixture’s too weak? Well, the answer is ‘none of the above’, you just messed up the power and torque curves, and didn’t understand how engines in boats actually work.

Why your boat is now even more of a dog than before is actually all contained in the above, but to break it down to the simplest, UNLIKE A CAR, in order to get to the top end horsepower, you need to move through the low- and mid-ranges first, and you produced an engine with LESS power in those ranges, and then to kneecap it completely, you added a steeper prop! Just like trying to take off from the lights in 3rd gear.

Let’s face it, 90% of boating is done in the mid-range, and those skiing really want quick acceleration. Building up a fire-breathing dragon is not the way to achieve those targets. For better acceleration, and better mid-range cruising, you actually want an engine with less power at the top, and more power low down. Marine engine suppliers worked for a long time with the goal of achieving the best possible power package with the most usable rev range, and that’s why a marine 350 doesn’t make as much top end as most people think it should. Yes of course a 350 can be built up to make in excess of 450hp, but it’s all at 6,000rpm+, and the low and mid-range are rubbish! Completely useless in a boat.

The only acceptable way to achieve the goal of ‘more power’ for better acceleration and cruising is by increasing the capacity of the engine, and it’s far better to increase stroke than bore.

The alternative way to get better acceleration and mid-range cruising from the existing engine is to drop a prop size. Simple as that. Yes the engine will turn faster for any given boat speed, but it’ll be loaded less (so the throttle won‘t be opened as far for the same rpm), the load on the drive gears will also be less, and you’ll experience less rpm variation between running up and down the ocean swells.

So, the next time someone says “I need more power”, ask them why, then smile quietly and understand that they likely know less about how engines in boats work than you do.

Chris….
 
Last edited:

Bondo

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 17, 2002
Messages
70,956
Ayuh,....... If you've got a 350, 'n want more useable power, ya build a stroker, 383,.....
As we all know, there's no replacement for displacement,.....
 

ahicks

Captain
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
3,957
Agree with Bondo. You DON'T want a super high performance motor with a power band that's only 500 rpm wide. Save them for the track. Holding that power band with a prop (single speed transmission) is not only nearly impossible, it IS impossible.

What most of us are after is the opposite extreme. Something able to make max power through the whole rpm band. Think truck motor for instance!

To do that, any increases that are worth a darn are usually done with more cubic inches.... KISS!!!
 

nola mike

Vice Admiral
Joined
Apr 22, 2009
Messages
5,363
Nice. I've tried in the past to find torque curves for these engines (particularly interested in the 3.7 v 4.3 v vortec v 4bbl/2bbl). I don't believe that you're sacrificing mid range with a vortec or a 4bbl carb, roller rockers, etc
 

ahicks

Captain
Joined
Sep 16, 2013
Messages
3,957
To make power without an increase in cubic inches, generally you have to focus available rpm to target a narrower power band, and generally speaking, that power band is going to be higher than what it was.

Mess around all you like, but eventually I'm pretty sure that's where you're going to end up.....

Some of us have been there, done that, a few times. Speaking for myself, those were some pretty expensive lessons!
 

nola mike

Vice Admiral
Joined
Apr 22, 2009
Messages
5,363
To make power without an increase in cubic inches, generally you have to focus available rpm to target a narrower power band, and generally speaking, that power band is going to be higher than what it was.

Mess around all you like, but eventually I'm pretty sure that's where you're going to end up.....
Those are generalities. You can certainly increase the power band across the board by better technology/efficiency in an engine. They didn't put vortecs in trucks to increase power at 5k rpm. I don't know about how the carbs affect the performance, but again, boat manufacturers wouldn't put a 4bbl carb unless it helped across the board. The secondaries get a lot more air in at high rpms, primaries give you higher velocities at lower rpms...
 

achris

More fish than mountain goat
Joined
May 19, 2004
Messages
27,468
You have all in essence repeated what I posted. Bondo's stroker is exactly what I referred to, about 3rd from last paragraph. Yes the vortec heads do breath better at all revs. But I'm sure you all know what I'm getting at...

Cheers, and thanks for reading and commenting.

Chris.
 

nola mike

Vice Admiral
Joined
Apr 22, 2009
Messages
5,363
Again, if anyone has access to the merc torque curves, that would be cool.
 

Lou C

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 10, 2002
Messages
12,661
and one last point, vehicles have transmissions, boats don't which is related to this point of the importance of power curves.
 

GA_Boater

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
May 24, 2011
Messages
49,038
and one last point, vehicles have transmissions, boats don't which is related to this point of the importance of power curves.

Maybe matching usable torque is why the new Merc V12 Verado has a two-speed transmission.
 

Lou C

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 10, 2002
Messages
12,661
Maybe matching usable torque is why the new Merc V12 Verado has a two-speed transmission.
certainly could be....
back in the hot rod era usually with a highly tuned engine radical cam, you needed a close ratio manual trans for it to perform.
so with a single speed transmission that a boat has, emphasis should really be on torque at the expense of HP.
 

Scott Danforth

Grumpy Vintage Moderator still playing with boats
Staff member
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
49,560
if you are building an engine for a boat, you must realize what you are doing. you want to increase low, mid and upper end torque. HP is absolutely meaningless since HP is torquexRPM/5250

you build an engine to increase the torque curve of the engine. the HP that comes out is a resultant. you need to build a boat motor like you would a dump-truck fully loaded while driving up-hill in sand while stuck in 4th gear.

to do that right, you want a cam that maxes out about 5500 RPM (most you want to spin a stock drive with stock oiling). you can go higher in RPM, however you are looking at drive changes to get there.

you want a good intake design that has lots of plenum volume and fairly long runners (both for low and mid torque).

For the cam, you want a reasonable amount of cam duration, however more importantly, you want good cam lift and proper cam timing. you want the intake event early to give you low to mid-range power vs top end. (advance a cam for torque, retard for higher end RPM). then you have to understand reversion and how cam duration and overlap effect duration (this is an expensive lesson)

when sticking with a given displacement (and I agree, there is no replacement for displacement). you must increase breathing efficiencies across the board as indicated before. you must understand what this means. it doesn't always mean more compression (dynamic compression ratios mean more than static). it doesnt always mean a different cam. It also means intake runner size, port size, intake runner finish, exhaust runner size, exhaust runner finish, Combustion chamber shape, combustion chamber blending, bowl blending, and the proper cam.

in addition to a simple bolt-on head like a vortec, you will want to properly port match the intake runners and the exhaust runners. this is hours of work with a can of dykem, a full-face respirator and a die grinder with a box of tootsie rolls (abrasives, not the dang candy)

Built properly, a good marine motor will have maybe 20% more power at the upper end bragging point, however can have up to 50% more torque from 1000 RPM to 3000 RPM.

to go beyond that, you need either forced induction via a blower or you need more displacement........ or both.

trying to talk the admiral into a nice 871 with dual quads........
 

Scott Danforth

Grumpy Vintage Moderator still playing with boats
Staff member
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
49,560
Maybe matching usable torque is why the new Merc V12 Verado has a two-speed transmission.
yes, that is the case. The other reason is it has been proven by aftermarket companies such as VSS on Volvo DP's for the past 10 years. bring the engine RPM's up by spinning the prop slower to get more bite to get the boat out of the hole, then switch gears to get more speed.

same principle that guys did with jet boats 50 years ago by running short case powerglide transmissions between the engine and jet pump or the engine and V-drives or the guys who were running modified TH400's (3-speeds) in hulls such as Shiada and Hallett as recent as 10 years back
 

helimech2003

Seaman Apprentice
Joined
Feb 2, 2012
Messages
47
I understand what your saying. A lot of people have fallen into the bigger is better hole but, wouldn't you want the power to come on at 2000rpm and fall off at 5500-6000?
The only reason I ask is, I see a lot of people saying for a boat you want your power from idle to 5k. Of the last few boats I've had it has taken at least 2000rpm to even think about getting her to plane out and normal cruising is around 2900-3500. Wouldn't you want the most power in the 2-6k range? The reason I ask is I might be rebuilding a 7.4 for a 29ft cabin boat and would like a little more umpf.
 

Bondo

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 17, 2002
Messages
70,956
yuh
I understand what your saying. A lot of people have fallen into the bigger is better hole but, wouldn't you want the power to come on at 2000rpm and fall off at 5500-6000?
The only reason I ask is, I see a lot of people saying for a boat you want your power from idle to 5k. Of the last few boats I've had it has taken at least 2000rpm to even think about getting her to plane out and normal cruising is around 2900-3500. Wouldn't you want the most power in the 2-6k range? The reason I ask is I might be rebuilding a 7.4 for a 29ft cabin boat and would like a little more umpf.
Ayuh,...... Cam it for 2,000 to 6,000 rpms, 'n it'll never get to 2,000,.....

Ya need the lower grunt to climb outa the hole,......
 

tpenfield

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 18, 2011
Messages
18,040
@achris comments makes sense to me . . .

Boats are different than cars . . . and so the whole thought process about power needs to be different as well. When you try to get more power out of the high end of the RPM range, it usually comes at the expense of the low RPM range.

Often we see folks asking about the smaller block engines that have similar HP to a bigger block . . . thinking the performance will be about the same. For what they use the boat for, it may be worse.
 

Mcfltfyter

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Apr 9, 2021
Messages
119
Does this apply to jet drives? It seems like a jet would "slip" like a clutch and let you get rpms up easier. Yes I am totally ignorant of jet drives.
 

Bondo

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 17, 2002
Messages
70,956
Does this apply to jet drives? It seems like a jet would "slip" like a clutch and let you get rpms up easier. Yes I am totally ignorant of jet drives.
Ayuh,...... Jet drives are completely different beasts,....
 
Top