krisnowicki
Lieutenant Junior Grade
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2007
- Messages
- 1,172
Whose is better?
Volvos Use cone clutchs for shifting. (like the Bravos) Alphas are still "dogs"I think that the Volvo outdrive is alot smoother shifting into gear than the clunk you get out of a Merc. The water pump impellar is easier to change also. I would say that Volvos are more expensive to work on but they are both good in my book.
Probably not....(maybe a little higher for some parts a little less for others... But here's an important point. Most of the people here like to do their own work. (Many people wouldn't be posting here if they just took it to the dealer with credit card in hand and didn't care what it cost)are volvos more expensive to work on? are the replacement parts more expensive
I donno.....was Charlie Strang (who later went on to OMC) , Jim Wynne (who sold the AVC drive to Volvo that became the "Aquamatic"), or Alex Alexander German? (a German name does not necessarily a German-make!!)Maybe Volvo's German engineers were better than Mercury's German engineers....
There's testimonial "evidence" like this on both sides. The 66 Mark Twain (150 Mercruiser) that my dad bought new performed just as flawlessly for 39 years........Volvo for me, family has had nothing else for over 30 years. Still using a 280 outdrive behind SBC, that is 27 years old with nothing more than changing oil. Also have an old 250 in a Double Eagle, that is 36 years old and still works perfectly.