Through bulkhead barbed fuel line fitting

w2much

Lieutenant
Joined
Jun 22, 2005
Messages
1,285
I have noticed that my through bulked hose fitting is an anti siphon valve. I have a few questions regarding the fuel lines and filters from the boat to the engine. This post is not about the engine but about fuel delivery from tank pick up through hoses to the water separator filter onto the through bulkhead fitting past the primer bulb to the point of entering the engine. The engine is a 1995 150 ELM Evinrude by the way.
I have had an issue with my fuel tank and done repairs to it leaking at the sending unit. I have two tanks, one is new, no issues, the original problematic one is what I will address. I have fuel lines from each go to a two way shut off valve, manually operated to run off either tank. Pick ups are clean fuel flow from each is good. I have removed the anti siphon valve from the problem tank. So there is good fuel flow through the lines, through the valves and into the fuel water seperater. From the separator to the through bulkhead fitting which is an anti siphon valve then onto line bulb to engine. The through bulkhead anti siphon valve is where my issues lie. My filter separator is higher than both the fuel tanks and the through bulkhead fitting. If I remove the ball in this through bulkhead fitting how hard will it be to prime my engine with the squeeze bulb? With the ball removed it will no longer be an anti siphon valve. Will fuel and the water contained in the filter return to the tank ? Over time a small amount of air is bound to enter the fuel line be it from the ffittings or from the engine .(carb bowls, needle seats, evaporation ect .) Can this create a backflush type effect from my seperater back to the tank? Returning both fuel and water?
 

Chris1956

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 25, 2004
Messages
27,815
Antisiphon valves seal the fuel tank, in case the fuel line starts leaking. It keeps a siphon from forming, filling the bilge with fuel. The fuel pump must overcome the sealing effect of the A-S valve.

You need one antisiphon valve on each tank. An antisiphon valve not on a tank serves no purpose, but to restrict fuel flow, which is bad.

I would get rid of the antisiphon valve on the bulkhead.
 

dingbat

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Nov 20, 2001
Messages
16,038
Being an outboard, there is no reason why you can’t remove the anti-siphon valves from the tank. Can’t siphon uphill.....I removed the valves from both tanks years ago.

You will have no problem priming the system if you don’t have a vacuum leak in your fuel system.

FWIW: check your tank select valves. Rebuilt my entire fuel system in an attempt to stop a vacuum leak in the fuel system. Turned out to be the tank select valve.
 

Chris1956

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 25, 2004
Messages
27,815
"Being an outboard, there is no reason why you can’t remove the anti-siphon valves from the tank. Can’t siphon uphill." Not true for a lot of outboards. If the fuel line has enough slack to sag to the base of the hull, or is intentionally routed below the top of the tank, and it breaks, a siphon can form.

I would keep the A-S valves, if the engine works properly with it.
 
Top