Question -or comment, about signature pictures

[lakelover]

Maybe this has been addressed and I missed it, but I'm wondering about the quality of the pictures that show in the signatures. I notice that everyone's signature picture is kind of soft and blurry, no matter how many times I clean my glasses! :lol: I know there are file size/image size restrictions, but I'm sure the pics are better quality when they are uploaded. They must be down sampled like crazy?

I guess there's no point in messing with it on my end, besides with all the problems, I'm afraid to change anything anyway. Anyone else notice this, or do I need to see the eye doctor again? :shocked::joyous:

 

[GA_Boater]

I think sig pics end with a lower resolution to get the file size down the acceptable limit. If I remember I had to play with the quality of mine. It's been a while.

 

[lakelover]

I think sig pics end with a lower resolution to get the file size down the acceptable limit. If I remember I had to play with the quality of mine. It's been a while.

I did that when I uploaded it a long time ago & had it looking pretty good. Guess that's just the way it is.

 

[southkogs]

I'm actually thinking your sig picture doesn't look too bad. It's not razor sharp, but I would think that's kinda' the nature of the picture.

 

[lakelover]

I uploaded a slightly different one and linked photo to photobucket, I think it looks a little better. Thanks.

 

[jbcurt00]

Yep, looked good before, looks great now.

 

[lakelover]

Thnx!

 

[GA_Boater]

LL - Pics of Permanent Vacation always look good. This one does seem better.