Re: Outdrive gear oil - difference between "marine" & other?
Um. Yeah. But those standards do not specifically have water contamination testing as part of the procedure....(I suppose no one says you cannot do it AND if the oil STILL meets the test with water then you could infer compliance)
Using D892 (foam test) is misleading because it doesn't mention water contamination at all in the test.........
Neither SAE, ASTM OR NMMA specify a marine "Standard" for "Marine" gear lubricant....maybe they will someday.....I suspect it's not necessary.
The manufacturers simply specify GL-5 synthetic or non-synthetic gear oil.
Most are even "silent" on whether you can use a limited slip type GL-5 (although some who have asked got a "Don't use it" answer)
Mercury makes the "claim" as does Amsoil who actually shows some test "results" on their product advertisement.
Of course it is useful to note that an oil that STILL meets some requirements with up to 10% water contamination, might make it "good"...... but just because other manufacturers don't make the claim, it doesn't mean that their oils wouldn't pass the same test.
Automotive gear oil makers, do no make these claims, but then again, they do not expect their product to be subjected to such use.
Not true at all. gearboxes can be subject to water contamination from many sources. (the main reason for D1401 and D2711)
I am willing to bet that ANY synthetic gear oil will meet the ASTM (four-ball, Falex etc) tests with up to 10% water.
I would rather see the results of D1401 and D2711 for "marine" gear oils. No one seems to post results of them..... probably because they ALL meet the requirements......
If you want to read more about these tests go here:
Properties of Enclosed Gear Drive Lubricants
Machinery Lubrication (and Lubrizol.com) is one of my favorite sites!