My guess is that the .05 version is more for older ignition systems with less energy. 071 makes the voltage go to a higher value before firing which is good for new ignitions with lots of energy but if you have an older weaker ignition then the .071 would still go to higher voltage but the duration of spark would be less so it could result in less combustion. Oddly the one chart I saw on NGK did not list my 2000 90HP ELPTO but did list the older merc motors and it recommended the .05 for the older, which kinda makes sense. I dont think its related to the temperature rating of the plug like they do for cars.According to the NGK site the BUHW-2 have a .071" gap and the
BUHW have a .050" gap. BUHW-2 are recommended I believe.
I don't remember when and on what engines Merc introduced their 40kV (unloaded) plug voltage. Would assume the difference may have occurred at that time.My guess is that the .05 version is more for older ignition systems with less energy. 071 makes the voltage go to a higher value before firing which is good for new ignitions with lots of energy but if you have an older weaker ignition then the .071 would still go to higher voltage but the duration of spark would be less so it could result in less combustion. Oddly the one chart I saw on NGK did not list my 2000 90HP ELPTO but did list the older merc motors and it recommended the .05 for the older, which kinda makes sense. I dont think its related to the temperature rating of the plug like they do for cars.
Not sure that gap information is correct. My '77 Merc 1500 called for BUHW, where my '73 Merc 850 called for BUHW-2. They both had the same battery driven CDI ignition system.
The BUHW-2 always looked to have a slightly longer electrode projection, but that is just a guess.