Mercruiser 5.7 mpi vs. 7.4 mpi

Mohabba

Seaman Apprentice
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
35
Im in the market for a Bayliner 2855/285.

I see them listet earlier with 7.4 mpi and later 5.7 mpi.

If maintained properly and with low hours, what engine would be prefered in terms of service and performance/fuel?

The systems need to have complete closed cooling or to be refitted. What would a refitting of closed cooling involve?

How much difference in corrosion can be expected from a raw water cooling system in fresh water like Lake Lanier/Hudson River and salt water?

Thank you for replies
 

Philster

Captain
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
3,344
Re: Mercruiser 5.7 mpi vs. 7.4 mpi

Let's see... salt water requires flushing after each use. It also means 1500 bucks worth of exhaust pieces get trashed about every 3-5 years.

5.7 vs 7.4? Well, they both are solid, tested platforms. The 7.4 is 30% larger and will lose the efficiency battle.

I'd go with the 7.4. You will always want more grunt if you throw a 5.7 in that boat. Heck, the 7.5 might be more efficient that a straining 5.7 when you measure ALL the variables.

.
 

boat1010

Senior Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Mar 10, 2009
Messages
781
Re: Mercruiser 5.7 mpi vs. 7.4 mpi

Like the saying goes."there is no substitute for horsepower" If I have a choice I will always go with the bigger motor. You can always go slower with a bigger motor but can't always go faster with a smaller one. I have the 7.4 in mine and no it isn't very friendly with the gas...But I never even considered fuel economy when I got the boat. I was looking for something that was powerful enough to get me where I was going, and to do the things that I wanted to do. A 28 foot boat is a lot of boat to be pushing around. Mine is a 24 ft and at times I would like to have had the 502 in it.
 

QC

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
22,783
Re: Mercruiser 5.7 mpi vs. 7.4 mpi

"there is no substitute for horsepower"
This is very true, and in some cases the 7.4L MPI and 5.7 MPI (350 Mag?) are only 10 horsepower apart (310 vs. 300). Annnnd, the 350 is lighter. I would still want the 7.4, but the fact is a 6.2 320 is rated higher than a 7.4 310. Just is. So these decisions are not always as simple as bigger is better, need all the info . . . ;)

Oh, and no need to start the torque discussion. With a Bravo 3, hole shot is not worth discussing, so assuming both setups will plane, I think this is very close to a push. Again, depends on the rating!!!!
 

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,537
Re: Mercruiser 5.7 mpi vs. 7.4 mpi

Take a look at what the torque ratings are at around 3000 RPM because that is what you are going to get stuck at if you can't get up on plane. Then you will see why you want the 7.4L. I have a 7.4L in my 24' boat and don't even need to change props when I go up to Tahoe from sea level.
 

QC

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
22,783
Re: Mercruiser 5.7 mpi vs. 7.4 mpi

I agree ^^^^^^ IF, there is a problem getting on plane.
 

Mohabba

Seaman Apprentice
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
35
Re: Mercruiser 5.7 mpi vs. 7.4 mpi

I see that the Bayliner 2855/285 is common in Denmark with a 6.2 320 option but havent seen any in the US, only later 5.7 300 and earlier 7.4 310.

I think that i would like a 6.2 320
 

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,537
Re: Mercruiser 5.7 mpi vs. 7.4 mpi

I think that i would like a 6.2 320
Why? The torque of the 7.4L is going to be way higher in the RPM that you are going to be operating in.

Are you looking for a used boat? The 7.4 hasn't been in boats for awhile. 8.1 replaced the 7.4L since 2001 or so. The 6.2L is very recent.
 

QC

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
22,783
Re: Mercruiser 5.7 mpi vs. 7.4 mpi

My 6.2 is a 2001 ;) And I don't agree with the torque comments if these are Bravo 3s . . . Peak torque only comes into play with the throttle at 100%. If you are struggling to plane, then yes, the 7.4 may outperform the 6.2. If not, the 6.2 should be faster top speed and have better fuel economy. In either case we are talking very small numbers, but I do not believe that the 7.4 will deliver any type of tangible performance benefit. Maybe better resale, but only due to misconceptions about marine engine performance. With a Bravo 1 or 2, I might feel diffferently. But again, only if the boat needs 100% throttle to plane. I feel almost the same with the 350 mag.

If you bring the 8.1 or 454 Mag MPI into the discussion, then my opinion changes as those are rated 375 and 385 respectively.
 

jaxnjil

Lieutenant
Joined
Aug 3, 2007
Messages
1,368
Re: Mercruiser 5.7 mpi vs. 7.4 mpi

Im in the market for a Bayliner 2855/285.

I see them listet earlier with 7.4 mpi and later 5.7 mpi.

If maintained properly and with low hours, what engine would be prefered in terms of service and performance/fuel?

The systems need to have complete closed cooling or to be refitted. What would a refitting of closed cooling involve?

How much difference in corrosion can be expected from a raw water cooling system in fresh water like Lake Lanier/Hudson River and salt water?

Thank you for replies

try to get B III drives no matter what you get. imho

jill and i just got a 310 dancer with twin mpi 7.4's and have a 7.4 W E

we looked and tried many boats is this range including bl.

the 7.4's will get as good of economy in this range and the smile factor isn't close to the same.

remember back in the day when honda 55 were popular and then the lucky kid on the block got a 90?
 

Fireman431

Rear Admiral
Joined
Sep 17, 2007
Messages
4,292
Re: Mercruiser 5.7 mpi vs. 7.4 mpi

300 vs 310 HP in a boat on the water? You'll never notice the difference. By the time you factor in the HP to weight ratio of the engines alone, there will be ZERO difference. 10 less HP in an engine that's 150lbs (guessing) lighter is neglible at best.

The torque/HP is going to nose over @ 5250 RPM anyway and big blocks don't like to spin at that speed. Mine are 4300 at WOT.

Resale is going to be better with the big block.
 

bruceb58

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 5, 2006
Messages
30,537
Re: Mercruiser 5.7 mpi vs. 7.4 mpi

Peak torque depends on engine to engine and rarely is as high as 5250.
 

26aftcab454

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
May 12, 2009
Messages
1,510
Re: Mercruiser 5.7 mpi vs. 7.4 mpi

I sure love my Mercruiser 7.4/ bravoIII
planes quickly- criuse 3500 rpm @ 30mph:cool:wot 4600 rpm 43mph
 

Black as

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Feb 22, 2010
Messages
417
Re: Mercruiser 5.7 mpi vs. 7.4 mpi

'All other things being equal, a bigger engine makes more power.' :D :D :D
 

Mohabba

Seaman Apprentice
Joined
May 13, 2007
Messages
35
Re: Mercruiser 5.7 mpi vs. 7.4 mpi

Why? The torque of the 7.4L is going to be way higher in the RPM that you are going to be operating in.

Are you looking for a used boat? The 7.4 hasn't been in boats for awhile. 8.1 replaced the 7.4L since 2001 or so. The 6.2L is very recent.

I havent seen one ad - at all - with a Bayliner 285/2855 having a 8.1
In the US (yachtworld.com) I only see earlyer models with 7.4 mpi and later until now with 5.7 mpi.
 
Top