Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

QC

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
22,783
CJY posted the following on another thread. I was already tempted to start a separate thread and his question motivated me to do so. I don't profess to know a whole lot specifically about H other than what I note below, please feel free to poke holes . . . like you guys and gals wouldn't ;) <br /><br />
Originally posted by CJY:<br />
Originally posted by QC: There are huge issues with Hydrogen.
Such as?
Production, there ain't none; infrastructure, there ain't none; safety, can you say Hindenburg?; on-board vehicle fuel storage, gaseous? try 10,000 PSI, liquid? try -320F (I may be off a degree or two); density, see PSI and cryogenics (these alone are not deal killers but people need to consider what type of energy it takes to compress anything at a reasonable rate to 10,000 psi, the energy to drive that compressor has to come from somewhere and liquid still requires about 4 times as much space as diesel or gasoline). Yes, many believe that this fuel is a savior. Now try and plan, deliver, produce, store . . . It ain't gonna happen.<br /><br />I have done nothing but sell natural gas fuel systems for the last 10 years. We have natural gas infrastructure throughout this entire planet, there is production, pipelines, liquefaction, storage, compressors (3600 PSI), tanks (3600 PSI and -259F), even vehicles, but we cannot get this stuff off the ground and it flippin' works . . .<br /><br />Have you ever been around a truck tire that blows at 75 PSI? Do you know what happens when a 3600 PSI tank lets go? Ever see a bus literally jump off the ground? Try 10,000 PSI . . . :eek: :eek: :eek:
 

ZmOz

Captain
Joined
Aug 13, 2003
Messages
3,949
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

Maybe in a hundred years. Until there's a hydrogen station on every corner nobody but treehuggers will buy them. And whenever they try to build a hydrogen station in somebody's backyard it will be like they're dumping nuclear waste. Americans will not go out of their way to be efficient until we burn the last drop of oil.<br /><br />The only thing that will help in the near future is biodiesel and ethanol...but of course we could never find enough of that to fuel the US. But just think how much less oil we would be using if all gas was 20% ethanol and all diesel was 20% biodiesel. That would save millions of barrels of oil every day. Not to mention lower emissions...<br /><br />Also as battery and hybrid technology gets better and better, electric cars are much more realistic. Imagine a hybrid that you could charge at home and drive the first 200 miles on battery power only, then get 70mpg with your diesel engine. That's already becoming a reality.
 

kenimpzoom

Rear Admiral
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
4,807
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

Hydrogen power is really stupid. Why waste all that energy to make a fuel that doenst exist naturally, when we have plenty of other fuels that can be easily used?<br /><br />I agree with ZmOz, biofuels make good sense.<br /><br />Ken
 

QC

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
22,783
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

I agree with you Z, with two exceptions . . .<br /><br />Ethanol and Bio-diesel are both more expensive than gasoline and diesel without subsidies. The reason I still like natural gas is that it is lower cost per BTU.<br /><br />The other issue is that hybrid technology does not address heavy-duty trucks and this is where the true fuel use really is. If you go more than you stop, hybrids don't work . . .<br /><br />Commercial fleets simply will not change unless there is an economic incentive ;)
 

gspig

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Jul 7, 2004
Messages
409
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

Hydrogen is a joke as a stand alone fuel. If there is a compact process to crack another fuel for fuel cell use, it may be feasible. There in lies the problem, what fuel to crack the hydrogen from? Bio-fuels are the most logical next step fuel. Aren't there farmers getting subsidies to not grow grains? The infrastructure exists for liquid fuels, and some vehicles are built to run on 80%ethanol. Current vehicles can be modified to run on alcohols.<br /> I have read that it takes 20 years for a new car to reach the lower income family. A radical shift in transportation fuel would cause catastrophic effects.<br /><br />Forgot, natural gas works, but look at what has happened to the price. Electric companies have been building more gas turbines because of environmental regs over burning coal and wastes. People can barely afford to heat their homes. Add a few million vehicles to the mix and the price will skyrocket.
 

KaGee

Admiral
Joined
Aug 14, 2004
Messages
7,069
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

The real answer is to send a team to Atlantis located in the Pegasus Galaxy. Retrieve the Zed-PM and learn about the source of power the Ancient's used.<br /><br />Oppps! that's Sci-Fi, nevermind. :p
 

Link

Rear Admiral
Joined
Apr 13, 2003
Messages
4,221
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

Originally posted by KaGee:<br /> The real answer is to send a team to Atlantis located in the Pegasus Galaxy. Retrieve the Zed-PM and learn about the source of power the Ancient's used.<br /><br />Oppps! that's Sci-Fi, nevermind. :p
But then you risk letting the Rath (sp) know where earth is! Just another feeding ground! ;)
 

QC

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
22,783
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

I think Kagee has it. Hydrogen is sci-fi. Big on the fi part.<br /><br />Ya know what the first large scale plan is for Hydrogen production? Natural gas reformation . . .<br /><br />I know, let's take the second best (maybe the best depending on the application) fuel we have. Throw some energy and money at it. Build some extremely expensive compressor or liquified H stations. It will be less dense, less safe and cost more, and everybody will simply buy it because they feel like it.<br /><br />I have to be fair, it will be emissions free, but from experience, consumers will pay a little bit more for environmentally friendly stuff. Commercial fleets will do it if the entire thing is break even or better. The entire thing includes the station, tooling, training, impact on revenue (heavier and bulkier tanks really **** truckers off) and of course the stuff itself . . .
 

ZmOz

Captain
Joined
Aug 13, 2003
Messages
3,949
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

Originally posted by QC:<br />Ethanol and Bio-diesel are both more expensive than gasoline and diesel without subsidies.
For now. As crude goes over $70/barrel...or $80...or $100, the cost of producing biodiesel and ethanol stays the same.<br /><br />Natural gas might work ok for trucks now, but the technology is already here and I don't see a bunch of trucking companies jumping at the chance to convert. Until diesel is $5+/gallon permanently it's not going to be very popular either, and I think we'd probably nuke saudia arabia before we let fuel get that expensive...
 

QC

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
22,783
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

Originally posted by ZmOz:<br /> Natural gas might work ok for trucks now, but the technology is already here and I don't see a bunch of trucking companies jumping at the chance to convert.
You're right again. However, we are saving Australian fleets $.20 a mile!!! No BS, figure is from a customer. Makes me crazy that it is not growing faster!! These guys usually think in half a cent per mile increments . . . :confused:
 

rolmops

Vice Admiral
Joined
Feb 24, 2002
Messages
5,703
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

All the arguments against H that were mentioned are true.That is why Hydrogene development is completely different.GM has a development center in Upstate NY where small reactors are in advanced stages of testing.these reactors fit on vehicles and through electrolysis and chemical reaction produce hydrogene which powers electro motors right on cars.No more internal combustion. That is the future.
 

ZmOz

Captain
Joined
Aug 13, 2003
Messages
3,949
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

I don't doubt it saves money...most people are just too dumb to realize just how much they can save and just how easy it can be to convert. When the average idiot hears about these alternative fuels they think "oh that's cool", but never think about how they might actually be able to use it.<br /><br />That's why hydrogen is so unlikely to ever be useful in our lifetime...the technology isn't even here yet, and it takes decades after that to catch on.
 

ZmOz

Captain
Joined
Aug 13, 2003
Messages
3,949
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

Originally posted by rolmops:<br />No more internal combustion. That is the future.
You still have to put energy into the car to make it go. Hydrogen is not a source of energy, it's a form of storage for energy. Electrolysis requires massive amounts of electricity which is mostly produced by burning natural gas, oil, coal, etc....
 

rolmops

Vice Admiral
Joined
Feb 24, 2002
Messages
5,703
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

ZmOz,<br />The hydrogene produced this way is fed to a reactor battery system where it looses its only electron and then gains it back from oxygene atoms,sort of like dnr/rnr cycles.This creates a charge difference in the battery cells and energy is produced.Of course it is a lot more complicated,but this is how it was explained to me.<br />The effiency ratio per volume is still a problem but it is fast approaching commercial viability or so we are told.<br />It is interesting that GM in not investing in hybrids. They obviously think they've got something better going.
 

CJY

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Jun 19, 2005
Messages
1,242
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

Production, there ain't none;
Give me a couple D cell batteries, 2 pieces of wire and a glass of water and I can begin production right now from my home. Water, H2O, 2 parts Hydrogen, 1 part oxygen. It is easily separated with just a little electrical current. Production is a non-issue. A great deal is already produced. It could most likely be separated from methane(natural gas) as well. Methane is CH4, 4 parts hydrogen and 1 part carbon. <br /><br /> http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/facts_figures.html?print <br /><br />
safety, can you say Hindenburg?;
Safety is an absolute issue. However, it is with gasoline and natural gas, and all other fossil fuels as well. Hydrogen is already easily transported all around the country via pipeline and tractor trailers as are fossil fuels. Again, not that big of an issue.<br /><br />
on-board vehicle fuel storage, gaseous? try 10,000 PSI, liquid? try -320F
I can't speak a great deal on this other than to say the the person on the other thread that I spoke of worked in H as a fuel source, specifically on fuel cell development. It's ready according to him. Back in 2002 or 3 his company was given nearly a million dollars for its development. Road blocks are currently up by those with fossil fuel interest. If you choose not to believe, fine. I cannot devulge info regarding his company. I'm not sure that it's my right or that I even should.<br /><br />
what type of energy it takes to compress anything at a reasonable rate to 10,000 psi
If the 10,000 psi is accurate(not arguing this), the automobile would not have to compress it, just keep it there, which would be accomplished with the cell. The producer would have to do the compressing. If you read the link above, again, you will find production a non-issue. It would be compressed at the processor, or whatever you would call them, and delivered in the liquid form. I'm not sure, but if the H can be placed in the auto as a gas rather than a liquid, the temp would be much warmer and the pressure greatly reduced.<br /><br />We may be years and years away from its common use, but only because there are big bucks in oils.<br /><br />
Yes, many believe that this fuel is a savior. Now try and plan, deliver, produce, store . . . It ain't gonna happen.
Spoken like someone in the business of natural gas. ;)
 

CJY

Lieutenant Junior Grade
Joined
Jun 19, 2005
Messages
1,242
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

You still have to put energy into the car to make it go. Hydrogen is not a source of energy, it's a form of storage for energy.
Hydrogen is very combustible as a fuel. The issue is where or how to store it.
 

rodbolt

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Sep 1, 2003
Messages
20,066
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

kinda like the old hydrogen peroxide engines of the 40's. took a trained crew to run one. same with CNG and LPG. takes a bit of intellegence to use it. most folks still cant handle gasoline and the thought of the average cell phone eared fueler at the 7-11 is a bit scary, couple that with the non maint that will happen and you will see a few "Hindenburgs" I will bet on it.<br /> I worked on the fleet trucks at speery in valljo years ago, 77-79, and all were duel fuel gas-LPG. I worked with the city of vallejo a bit when they were playing with CNG. both had minor drawbacks but major advantages, anyone ever taken a 460 ford apart at 150K thats been run on LPG? its clean as a pin.<br /> as soon as our current admin leaves maybe the next admin can take back alternate fuel incentives so graciously given to big oil and place them in an area that will aggressivly persure it.<br /> but to give the task and cash of developing an alternate to oil to the oil companies is like asking the fox to guard the hen house and giving him a skillet and a stove to help.<br /> will we run out of oil? one day, maybe. will the speculation and playing on emotions drive the cost up? most definatly. like the argument about switching off a 100 watt light to "save" electricity. it wont "save AC current as AC must be used the instant its generated or its "lost" anyway. AC cannot be stored as AC. the dynamo is gonna generate X watts and it does not mnatter much if 1 bulb is burning or 100. only affects how many dynamos the power company turns on that day.
 

QC

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
22,783
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

CJY,<br /><br />The fact that I sell nat gas vehicles does not alter my opinion. I don't think that way; especially on this forum. I think natural gas sucks as a vehicle fuel too, but it works and is available, and the key is it costs less and we have a very mature infrastructure!<br /><br />BTW, nat gas is a lot safer than gasoline. Remember it doesn't puddle and it is lighter than air. Also, it is actually quite hard to get to burn. It has a much narrower band of fuel air ratio than conventional fuels. Hydrogen will go if you look at it cross-eyed. The safety issue with nat gas has very little to do with flammability, it is the pressure or temperature that is of concern. WIth hydrogen you have higher presure, lower temps and super duper flammability. You could fill your house with natural gas and walk in with a flame thrower and it wouldn't light.<br /><br />Do you think the producers of Hydrogen will compress it for free? Oh, I know, they'll take the free hydrogen and generate electricity and then power up an electric compressor and compress the H to 10,000 PSI. Voila, done deal. Where are these pipelines?
 

ZmOz

Captain
Joined
Aug 13, 2003
Messages
3,949
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

Originally posted by CJY:<br />Hydrogen is very combustible as a fuel. The issue is where or how to store it.
But it takes about as much energy to create and store it as you get back. You can't just pump hydrogen out of the ground. You have to make it using electricity. A tank of compressed hydrogen is basically a battery. It took just as much energy to create and compress that hydrogen as you will ever get when you run your car on it. It's still cleaner and more efficient than burning oil, but it's not going to save the world....
 

tomatolord

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
Messages
548
Re: Hydrogen? Dream or reality?

whoa guys there a few billion dollar company's that sell fuel cells today. There are many applications where they need energy 24x7x365.<br /><br />what one post mentioned is true hydrogen is a fantastic storage device.<br /><br />Use wind farms, solar, sea farms, to produce electric, coal plants in wv, or even mexico which produces hydrogen the hydrogen is then pumped to where it is needed - something you cannot do with electric. <br /><br /> Electricity needs 2 things<br /><br />1 to be produced near where it will be used, <br /><br />2 needs to be made for max peak demand. So the electric plants are way over engineered to begin with.<br /><br />The first uses of hydrogen will be at the home, where you will have a fuel cell to produce the electricity that the home needs. <br /><br />Produce the electricity where it is cheapest to produce, hydro in remote canada, wind in ND, solar arrays in Nevada/mexico, make they hydrogen and pipe it to where it is needed.<br /><br />A solar array the size of TX would produce all of the energy the US needs all by itself.<br /><br />2nd will be cars<br /><br />The issue with cars is that the cost to the wheel of hydrogen versus gasoline. Until the cost of oil reaches 70-80 per barrel and stays there then hydrogen is NOT cost effective.<br /><br />With oil at 60 you see alternative sources biodiesel, ethanol etc coming into play. When oil is at 50 those fuels cannot compete beyond their local markets.<br /><br />Corn right now, due to biotech, produces 26% more energy then it takes to produce it. In essence corn is solar power. However ethanol only has something like 66% of the energy in a gallon that gasoline does. So as these numbers come into a better balance and advances are made in other areas. Better biotech making better corn. Then these technologies will come into play.<br /><br />Again as the price of oil goes up there are many alternative sources of energy out there and you will see them come into play.<br /><br />The magic number for oil is 60-70 a barrel and it must stay there for investors to invest in other forms of energy production.<br /><br />After doubling in size, then doubling again the past few years, the ethanol industry consists of 95 U.S. plants that produced 4 billion gallons last year. That's only enough to replace 3% of the 140 billion gallons of gasoline the USA burned last year. And it's almost ridiculously far from the 119 billion gallons of ethanol necessary for a nationwide switch to E85.<br /><br />An additional 32 ethanol plants are under construction, and nine are being expanded. That will add about 1.8 billion more gallons annually but still leaves ethanol a bit player in the fuel game.<br /><br />Again there is much effort being put into finding MORE oil to keep the price low versus creating alternate energy sources. <br /><br />IMHO <br /><br />Hydro cars are not that far off. Here is the scenario.<br /><br />You have 2 cars 1 will be hydro<br /><br />The hydro car is hooked up to the house so that it powers the house during the normal operations, when you leave the house you dont need the power requirements so you run the house of the electric grid. The hydro car is used for around town, limit of 200 miles per tank, but for most people 200 is plenty, remember you fill it up each night in the garage. The second car is gasoline and that is the long range car.<br /><br />Cities with major air pollution will provide credits to the people who buy and use these cars.<br /><br />As far as being more explosive - not much difference between 4 sticks of dynamite and 8 in the fuel tank of your car.<br /><br />Pressurized tanks will go the route of the blue rhino propane tanks, you wont pull up and fill your tank - you swap it out for a full one and the leave the old one behind. They think you will have a combo tank, one that is not pressurized but for local driving and if you want to go long distance you plug in the pressurized tank.<br /><br />IMHO hydro will be first in China, as they make more money they will buy NEW cars not replacement and their air quality will make it easier<br /><br />- I have read up on this for the past 5 years and I wondered the same thing <br /><br /><br />Tomatolord
 
Top