redfury
Commander
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2006
- Messages
- 2,655
I'm posting this for my brother, but I'm familiar with his engine ( I do the mechanical work for him ).
He's got a 1985 85hp 'Zuki that won't start. We've got 125psi per cylinder ( lucky us! ) and I verified spark.
I can see that we are getting fuel at the filter, and fuel is flowing through the fuel pump assembly.
However, we get no kick like the motor is starting or trying to start ( it turns over fine...new battery ) The plug I pulled was dry. So, the first thing I did was check the fuel pump. I pulled the pump off the motor and discovered that there was no "rod" or "lever"..whichever you want to call it...coming out of the motor and into the fuel pump.
I'm not super familiar with marine engines in particular, but I've studied the books and schematics enough to realize that 2 strokes aren't much different in fuel delivery than a 4 stroke engine.
Pulling the pump off and apart, it has a diaphram style fuel pump, the diaphram looked solid and flexing it did not reveal any cracks. However, the metal striking plate showed signs of wear in a small circular pattern. This makes me assume that the pump is delivered it's "pulse" through a rod from the block moving the diaphram against the spring inside.
there was no rod.
Previous owner "claimed" to have disconnected the oil injection system prior to parking the boat after they ripped off half the skeg and chewed up the prop prior to the boat finding dry land for the last 5 years ( they also "claim" to have replaced the driveshaft..yet the skeg and prop are clearly damaged and need repair ).
I'm wondering if they pulled the fuel pump rod thinking they were disconnecting the oil injection system ( which is not easily accessible from my observation ).
However, that being said and done, a .pdf file I downloaded of the engine systems broken down part by part, system by system - reveals no "rod" in the schematic, nor references it in the part identification table in the fuel pump section, thus my confusion.
It's obvious it had one at some point, but why was it removed, and is this the cause for a no start condition?
I can only assume that if the engine started 5 years ago, it was because there was fuel in the fuel bowls and it was able to draw enough fuel through vacuum
He's got a 1985 85hp 'Zuki that won't start. We've got 125psi per cylinder ( lucky us! ) and I verified spark.
I can see that we are getting fuel at the filter, and fuel is flowing through the fuel pump assembly.
However, we get no kick like the motor is starting or trying to start ( it turns over fine...new battery ) The plug I pulled was dry. So, the first thing I did was check the fuel pump. I pulled the pump off the motor and discovered that there was no "rod" or "lever"..whichever you want to call it...coming out of the motor and into the fuel pump.
I'm not super familiar with marine engines in particular, but I've studied the books and schematics enough to realize that 2 strokes aren't much different in fuel delivery than a 4 stroke engine.
Pulling the pump off and apart, it has a diaphram style fuel pump, the diaphram looked solid and flexing it did not reveal any cracks. However, the metal striking plate showed signs of wear in a small circular pattern. This makes me assume that the pump is delivered it's "pulse" through a rod from the block moving the diaphram against the spring inside.
there was no rod.
Previous owner "claimed" to have disconnected the oil injection system prior to parking the boat after they ripped off half the skeg and chewed up the prop prior to the boat finding dry land for the last 5 years ( they also "claim" to have replaced the driveshaft..yet the skeg and prop are clearly damaged and need repair ).
I'm wondering if they pulled the fuel pump rod thinking they were disconnecting the oil injection system ( which is not easily accessible from my observation ).
However, that being said and done, a .pdf file I downloaded of the engine systems broken down part by part, system by system - reveals no "rod" in the schematic, nor references it in the part identification table in the fuel pump section, thus my confusion.
It's obvious it had one at some point, but why was it removed, and is this the cause for a no start condition?
I can only assume that if the engine started 5 years ago, it was because there was fuel in the fuel bowls and it was able to draw enough fuel through vacuum