Criminal Rights

NYMINUTE

Captain
Joined
Oct 6, 2003
Messages
3,298
Beat-up homeowner sees justice slip out of reach<br /><br />It was after 4 p.m. on June 23, 2003, and Nenit Stafford was watching “Judge Judy” on television in her Winchester Road home when a man appeared in front of her.<br /><br />“Give me your keys,” he demanded.<br /><br />The petite woman was terrified, and the man continued to make demands. “Give me your keys. Drive me.”<br /><br />In another room, Wayne Stafford, who was on his computer, at first thought it was the television but decided to check it out anyway. He came face to face with a man he said was huge.<br /><br />Police said the man was only 6 feet tall and 220 pounds, but Stafford, 61 at the time and 5 foot 9, says he looked a lot bigger.<br /><br />A fight broke out between Stafford and the man who had barged into his home, looking to get his hands on a car. Nenit Stafford, 43, fled the house, where she encountered police who had been chasing the man.<br /><br />Moments later, the man fled the house, chased by a bloodied Stafford, who suffered a pummeled face and broken rib in the fight.<br /><br />Police, Stafford says, saw the man running from the house, tackled him, and the brief home invasion was suddenly over.<br /><br />The man, police say, was Walter J. Moore, then 37, of Wells County. He had become involved in a police chase in Wells County that had extended into Allen County. Moore had wrecked his car and, looking for another car to flee in, had come through the open back door of the Staffords’ home.<br /><br />Moore was taken back to Wells County to face charges where the chase started, and appeared at an initial hearing a week later. But on his next court date, Aug. 27, 2003, Moore never appeared.<br /><br />Eventually, Moore was captured, and on May 14 of this year, he was sentenced in Wells County to a year and a half in jail on felony charges of drunken driving and resisting arrest. But he still faced charges in Allen County of invading someone’s home and beating up the homeowner.<br /><br />That case, though, has never come to trial, and it looks as though it might never. And Stafford is outraged.<br /><br />The Allen County Prosecutor’s Office says it is a case of everything going wrong that could have gone wrong, and some legal rulings that don’t make any sense to Stafford.<br /><br />It seems that on June 11 of this year, while Moore was serving time in Wells County on the drunken driving and resisting arrest convictions, his attorney filed a motion for a speedy trial in Allen County. That means the county had 70 days to try Moore.<br /><br />Also on June 11, an Allen County court ordered Moore transferred to the Allen County Jail to await trial in the home invasion case. But Moore was never brought here.<br /><br />Finally, on Aug. 30, another court order was issued, ordering the sheriff to pick up Moore and bring him to Allen County for trial on Sept. 14. But Moore wasn’t picked up under that order, either, because the order mistakenly instructed deputies to go to the Wabash County Jail. Moore was in Wells County. The order has a note printed on it: “Not at Wabash!”<br /><br />That was all irrelevant, though. Moore, under the speedy trial rule, had to be tried by Aug. 20, and a court date wasn’t even set until nearly a month after that.<br /><br />On Oct. 6, Allen Superior Court Magistrate Robert Schmoll ruled that the speedy trial time limit had expired, and the case against Moore was dismissed.<br /><br />Stafford, as we said, is outraged. He’s unhappy that he wasn’t contacted by the prosecutor’s office as the case dragged on for a year and a half. The only way he kept informed was to call on his own.<br /><br />And he’s mystified and disgusted that though the man was convicted of fleeing police in another county, he won’t even be tried for exploding into Stafford’s house and beating him up. Sure, Moore got a year and a half in Wells County, but what about him, Stafford asks.<br /><br />Mike McAlexander of the prosecutor’s office says the case experienced one mistake after another. “It’s an awful situation for the Staffords,” McAlexander said. Usually, speedy trial cases are indicated by big letters on the trial schedule, but in this case, no trial date was even set.<br /><br />What also mystifies Stafford is the ruling. The speedy trial rule is designed to keep people from wasting away in jail, waiting for their trial to start.<br /><br />The Allen County prosecutor argued that Moore was never held in Allen County to await trial in the Stafford case.<br /><br />He was in jail, but serving time on a separate conviction in an out-of-county jail, and that time shouldn’t count for speedy trial purposes.<br /><br />But the court rejected the argument because the court on June 11 ordered Moore transported to Allen County to await trial. Never mind that he was never brought to Allen County.<br /><br />Stafford says his wife still begins to cry when she thinks of the terror she went through the day the man entered her home and fought with her husband.<br /><br /><br />But there’s not much Stafford can do, other than know that Moore will remain in jail for a few months yet – on a charge he fled police. :mad:
 

spratt

Lieutenant
Joined
Oct 13, 2004
Messages
1,461
Re: Criminal Rights

There is a fella named Vang who could take care of that guy for them!!! He even likes the chase, but the catch part is the most fun he's ever had!!! Moore could try to outrun him, and if he can, then set him free...but if not, then it's just one vang moore...
 

AK_Chappy

Lieutenant
Joined
May 25, 2003
Messages
1,357
Re: Criminal Rights

There is a reason I own guns!<br />The cops wouldn't have had to take him to court if he was in my house, threatening my wife!!!<br /><br />nuff said!<br /><br />AK Chappy
 

deputydawg

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Aug 29, 2004
Messages
1,607
Re: Criminal Rights

Information may not be correct here. Onc e formally charged with a crime the prosecution has 6 MONTHS not 70 DAYS to comply with the right to a speedy trial. If he is in jail on another charge then the speedy trial is not an issue, because it does not interrupt his freedom.<br />The prosecution has the right to dismiss the charges, then re-file them at a different time. If dismissed without an aquital or innocent finding by the court, then the double jeopardy defense is also not an issue. <br />The victim would definately have a good civil suit because of the assault and any damages suffered. The problem is he would not only be able to sue the suspect, but could also sue the police that he was running from. And he would win against the police. Police are supposed to catch those they are chasing, or else they are in a position of being sued by immediate future victims. They also are limited in chasing suspects. Anyone injured in a persuit can also sue and will win against police chasing a suspect, even if the suspect is acting reckless and neglegantly injures one due to his actions in running.<br />Either way, the speedy trial should be 6 months from formal charges being filed. If these charges were filed he would have either a detainer filed with the jail he was held in, or they would have had to seek an arrest warrant or in some states an indictment charging him. He then must be brought before a judge for an arraignment to read the complaint and notify him formally of his charges. <br />ALso the judge here should recieve a swift kick for allowing the motion for speedy trial since the turd was in jail at the time and these charges did not pose any restraints on his freedom.<br />The system realy stinks, and is not perfect. BUT it is the best system we have.
 

1730V

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Feb 14, 2004
Messages
563
Re: Criminal Rights

As far as I am concerned If you are running from the police there is a reason. They should be able to shoot first and ask questions later.
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Criminal Rights

POW!! :mad: POW, POW, POW, POW, POW, POW, POW, POW, POW, click, chunk, POW, POW, POW, POW, POW, POW, POW, POW, POW, POW, click, THUD, THUD, THUD, BASH!! :mad:
 

spratt

Lieutenant
Joined
Oct 13, 2004
Messages
1,461
Re: Criminal Rights

Perhaps Mr. Vang's attorneys would be interested...
 

NYMINUTE

Captain
Joined
Oct 6, 2003
Messages
3,298
Re: Criminal Rights

Originally posted by spratt:<br /> Perhaps Mr. Vang's attorneys would be interested...
Mr. Vang's attorney must be happy to see this. Hope he watches his language with the Vangster
 
Top