Re: Cam and engine Gurus.. Need a blessing or condemning
Sorry to disagree with the last poster, but cam design has come quite a ways and the comp xm series is every bit as good a product as any "factory" rv or factory cam. period.
There are several important differences in a marine cam. The xm cams and other marine designed cams and have a split duration - the exhaust duration is longer than the intake duration which means the exhaust is open longer than the intake to account for the poor design of marine exhaust manifolds and relatively restrictive marine exhaust systems.
In addition, the 256 cam would be a VERY safe choice for your engine, would be every bit as reliable as a factory or "rv" cam and would make a little more power without any sacrifice in fuel economy (read more distance traveled per dollar - maybe subtle, but could be measurable). It'll give you a little higher valve lift as well. especially coupled with 1.6 ratio rocker arms, that cam will make a decent bit more power than a "stock" cam (often the comp cams engineers will tell you to run 1.6 ratio rocker arms... the lobe profiles can definately handle it with the spring pressures they spec for their cams).
If you're interested in reading more and comparing the specifications of factory version marine cams with the cams you're looking at send me a pm with an email address and I'll send you some interesting reading...
to help you think about it, the merc factory hydraulic flat tappet marine cam has the following specifications
duration at 50: 200 intake, 212 exhaust
valve lift with 1.5: ratio rocker arms: .400 intake: .410 exhaust
lobe centerlines: 108 atdc, 112 btdc
Lobe seperation angle 110.
merc factory hydraulic roller cam (much more modern design):
duration at 50 197 intake, 207 exhaust
valve lift with 1.5: ratio rocker arms: .430 intake: .450 exhaust
lobe centerlines: 106 atdc intake , 112 btdc exhaust
Lobe seperation angle 109.
Competition cams XM256H:
duration at 50: 212 intake, 218 exhaust
valve lift with 1.5: ratio rocker arms: .447 intake: .462 exhaust
lobe centerlines: 110 atdc intake, 114 btdc
Lobe seperation angle 112.
you listed the 262 cam specs in your original post...
comp cams web page describes the 262 grind as: Hydraulic-Biggest cam for inboard/outboard, good mid-range with excellent response, noticeable idle. it would probably get by for reversion - probably - with your manifolds, and would have a bit of a lope at idle. the 256 will be a very safe choice...
and the 256 grind as: Good for inboard/outboard pleasure boat, skiing and good economy.
the 256 was designed for your aplication and has been used in a TON of boats...
If you were building a 383, the 262 would run about the same in a 383 as the 256 does in a 350...fyi
Note that you should not use your stock valve springs, and you should make sure to check your valve train geometry as well... If you are still stuck, send me a pm with your email. I'll scan some pages out of a book on marine engine performance for you. Hope this is helpful... Not an expert, but have some experience and do my homework when making choices like this. Cheers
ps. drive is fine and don't know about your manifolds. I wich you had been doing this last summer - I'd have given you the complete later exhaust system with all the brackets, hoses and y-pipe for the cost of shipping. I wound up putting them on the curb for the scavengers to take for recycle... along with heads, etc... Good luck with your engine