Re: bank used in funding terrorists being sued
"There is no connection between the article and his stated beliefs. None. Therefore he is simply creating a platform for antaganizm, speculation, and potentiality, to forward his own unsubstantiated beliefs and machinations." <br /><br />I would rewrite this to say<br /><br />"There is a connection between the article and his stated beliefs(from other posts re W's complicity in 911. MrScott is saying that this is a funding link to W that supports his theory that W created 911 to give him a mandate for the war). He is creating a platform for antaganizm, speculation, and potentiality, to forward his own unsubstantiated beliefs and machinations." <br /><br />I also think his opinions are off the wall and have said so. If my rewrite is a definition of a troll then I agree with you Pointer, MY. I would also say that PW2's view(for example) of my posts would also fit this definition.