9.9 / 15 hp gear ratio

KamikazeKid

Recruit
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
4
What is the gear case ratio for late 1970s to 1990s? I want to correlate engine RPM to prop RPM.
 

jmendoza

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jun 9, 2008
Messages
314
Re: 9.9 / 15 hp gear ratio

Do not have the manual here, but it's listed in the specifications section, hopefully someone here has a manual. My literature is 200 miles away at the lake where my cabin and boat are kept.
 

AlTn

Commander
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
Messages
2,813
Re: 9.9 / 15 hp gear ratio

from omc manual for 1978 9.9 evinrude....propeller gear ratio..12:29
 

Rick.

Captain
Joined
Jul 30, 2006
Messages
3,740
Re: 9.9 / 15 hp gear ratio

Gee that was easy. I was just getting ready to pull my leg and gear case apart so I could count the gear teeth. Actually I'm pulling your leg ...not mine. Interested to know what your going to do with that information though. Rick.
 

Patate

Seaman
Joined
Jan 4, 2006
Messages
59
Re: 9.9 / 15 hp gear ratio

Rick, 12 engine revolutions, 29 prop revolutions
 

Rick.

Captain
Joined
Jul 30, 2006
Messages
3,740
Re: 9.9 / 15 hp gear ratio

thanks for that. I had it figured to 3 to 7 1/4. Never was any good at math. I'm still wondering why the question was asked though. Rick.
 

KamikazeKid

Recruit
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
4
Re: 9.9 / 15 hp gear ratio

Isn't it 29 engine revolutions to 12 prop revolutions? In exploded view, drive shaft gear is quite a bit smaller than the propshaft gears. (That would make it 2.42:1, which would confirm what I've seen one other place.)

Since you asked, I'm doing a typical "engineer" thing - confirming that what everyone says is true. That a 15 hp kicker offers no advantage over a 9.9 hp. (I'm sure this will stir some comments.)

I set up a simple spreadsheet to calculate forward speed from engine RPM, prop pitch, and assumed slip. Even if I assume a 7" pitch and 40% slip, I still get 5.7 kts at 4000 RPM.

From what I've read, the 15 hp OMC gets the extra hp power by increasing max RPM from about 5000, to 6000. (Makes sense to me, since the bore, stroke, and porting are the same.) Since I'll achieve hull speed before 4500 RPM, I'll never see the extra 5 hp, so there's no sense in paying more. (Besides, who's going to run an emergency motor for hours, at 5000+ RPM?)

I had a choice to buy a rebuilt 9.9 for $1,300, or a rebuilt 15, for $1500. At first I chose the 15, but then changed my mind.

Thanks for the info!
 

Haffiman

Commander
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
2,454
Re: 9.9 / 15 hp gear ratio

For a kicker/trolling prop, try this one:
http://www.discountboatpropellers.com/product_propeller_info.html?products_id=97
4prop.jpg
 

Rick.

Captain
Joined
Jul 30, 2006
Messages
3,740
Re: 9.9 / 15 hp gear ratio

I'm kind of with you on this. What is kts? I've been of the opinion that for a kicker, small is better. ( my opinion has not included any math) Going a little further, would a 6 HP. not do the job even more efficiently? There is a large difference between a kicker and an emergency back up. For a back up I can see where more HP. might be more advantageous in wind and current. Rick.
 

KamikazeKid

Recruit
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Messages
4
Re: 9.9 / 15 hp gear ratio

kts: abbreviation for knots.

Here in Hawaii, "kicker" is synonymous with "emergency backup." Few people use downriggers, or do any slow trolling. Most small engines are for backup, and as you note, one needs to plan for less than ideal conditions.
 

Haffiman

Commander
Joined
Dec 17, 2009
Messages
2,454
Re: 9.9 / 15 hp gear ratio

Most trolling/kicker/emergency engines you see around are totally wrong propped.
They will normally never be able to pull above 5-9 knots, but propped for 15 and above.
As result too many are carrying to heavy a load, too many hp with too high fuel consumption around.
Most outboard manufacturers have a 'sail' propeller intended for 'hull speed', but one hardly see those on a kicker engine.
I wonder why?
 

jmendoza

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Jun 9, 2008
Messages
314
Re: 9.9 / 15 hp gear ratio

Use a "sailmaster" prop designed for these by OMC, works great at below planning speeds.

At the local marina, they have a small 12 foot flat bottom launch for hauling boats to and from the main dock out to their mooring bouys. For the launch, since it's a tug, they use a 15 and the sailmaster prop as this gives the most low speed grunt and control when towing. They told me that over the years, they have always used a 15 instead of a 9.9 becuase it has more power, which they need for the tug. I found this out when I asked if they had any 15 engines in the bone yard, and they said the had far more 9.9 scrap from their rental fishing boat fleet.
 

ChrisAG

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Sep 13, 2009
Messages
176
Re: 9.9 / 15 hp gear ratio

From what I've read, the 15 hp OMC gets the extra hp power by increasing max RPM from about 5000, to 6000. (Makes sense to me, since the bore, stroke, and porting are the same.) Since I'll achieve hull speed before 4500 RPM, I'll never see the extra 5 hp, so there's no sense in paying more. (Besides, who's going to run an emergency motor for hours, at 5000+ RPM?)

You should have gone with the 15 and propped it to reach 6000 rpm at WOT. That doesn't mean you would actually RUN it full time at WOT, but at least it wouldn't be lugging, which it certainly would be at your proposed 4500 rpm.

You can run those engines all day at 6000 rpm (which I did as a kid). However some people believe if you are over 6000 rpm you should richen the fuel:eek:il ratio.

Secondly, the 15 is not ONLY showing higher power at higher rpm, but throughout the rev range. Think of it this way; in the old days, GM offered 5.0L V8s with either a 2-barrel or 4-barrel carb at extra cost. You think the 4-barrel only gave power at the top of the rev range? That extra power was available any time you stomped on it.
 
Top