2005 Sea Ray 180 Sport, Positives & Negatives

Status
Not open for further replies.

Brianheleneva

Recruit
Joined
Jun 23, 2011
Messages
1
Looking at a 2005 Sea Ray 180 Sport with a Mercruiser 3.0 L 135 horse outdrive. Please give any positive or negatives on this model boat and motor. Current boat is a 89 Bayliner and I dont want to get caught in another nightmare like I've had with this boat! Thanks!!
 

Cincyrunner

Seaman
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
62
Re: 2005 Sea Ray 180 Sport, Positives & Negatives

Sea Ray has a good reputation for building a solid boat. Can't speak from personal expereince, since I don't own one. But mine is similar is size....2005 Four Winns 190. I think it's a good size for us, a family of 4. As for the motor, a lot depends on what you're primary purpose will be, how many people are typically going to be in the boat, what kind of water you'll run her in, etc. If it's just you and a spouse cruising the local lakes, the 3.0 L will be fine. If you have kids that'll want to tube and ski, you probably will need more power. Especially when the kids get older and they want to invite friends to tube and ski. I have a 5.0L in mine, and it's got all the power ranges I'll ever need. Sure, I'll use more fuel, but I really don't think the costs will be significant enough. I'd rather have the option available for more power if I need it.
 

capslock118

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Apr 27, 2009
Messages
249
Re: 2005 Sea Ray 180 Sport, Positives & Negatives

I seen a 2001 model of what you are looking for on craigslist for $9600 - If I had 9600 I would jump on it.

I have an outboard version from '91. It's a good boat, but was terribly mistreated by previous owners so a lot needs to be done. Soft wood on the floor in some places, there is practically no base where the exterior oil tank is now because of all the rotting.

The worse part is the wood that the vinyl was put together on was never coated to protect against the environment. All the vinyl needs to be replaced too.

This is a 20 year old boat btw, and the 2001 model I seen on craigslist was in outstanding appearance.
http://newhaven.craigslist.org/boa/2462102499.html.

I would chalk it up to previous owners, figure out how they treated their boat and you can get an idea of if there will be any headaches.
 

oldjeep

Admiral
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
6,455
Re: 2005 Sea Ray 180 Sport, Positives & Negatives

Kind of depends - what has been your nightmare with the bayiner? The Searay has the same motor, probabally a different outdrive than your 89. A 2005 SeaRay 180 is very comperable to a 2005 Bayliner 185 - the bayliner actually has nicer upholstry IMO
 

bavedoggs

Seaman Apprentice
Joined
Jun 28, 2011
Messages
35
Re: 2005 Sea Ray 180 Sport, Positives & Negatives

I just purchased a 2005 Sea Ray 180 Sport. After months of searching and talking to boat owners and internet reviews, I narrowed it down to a 2004-2005 Sea Ray 180 Sport. It has a great lay-out that seats people in very comfortably. The interior has a great finish, seats are comfortable and good looking, the snap out carpet is a huge plus. I agree that if ya plan on wake boarding or skiing that you'll want the bigger engine...but the 3.0 Mercruiser pairs to this boat very well. The boat has more than enough power to pull adults on an inter-tube, let alone children. I feel the engine provides the boat plenty of get-up-and-go and it had no problem getting my family of 4 (two normal sized adults,two small children)up to 40-45 MPH. The matching painted trailer with the swivel tongue is also a plus that I can park the boat in my garage. If i had to do it all over again....I'd buy a 2005 Sea Ray 180 Sport. Just my opinion...
 

jkust

Rear Admiral
Joined
Aug 2, 2008
Messages
4,942
Re: 2005 Sea Ray 180 Sport, Positives & Negatives

I live in a state where we have nothing to do but go boating with our 11,000+ lakes. Everyone has a boat and they are under 20 feet so as to fit in the garage. Here you don't upgrade to a larger boat but to a higher end boat of the same size. I've also been boating for 38 years, have owned multiple boats and actually amongst them currently count a Bayliner. That said, I will not be as nice as the rest where small Sea Ray's are concerned. If I'm coming off of only having owned the Bayliner, and never, ever saw a competing brand the Sea Ray will be fantastic by comparison and the 3.0 will be like a dream. When I bought my sig boat, of course i'd seen and experienced multiple boats over the years. Regardless I still checked out the offerings around town at both the new dealerships and used boats. My take on small Sea Rays is that they are in your face, sub par, and sparton for the price they charge. Their much larger boats are as nice as any but while some builders do not diferentiate or deviate in how they appoint and build their smaller boats, Sea Ray does. It takes as long as you can line up two or three competing brands to realize the marketing doesn't match the product. If you are a get the most for your hard earned dollar person, I can't comprehend how a smaller Sea Ray could even make it on the list. Now that said if the price is right, all of that goes out the window because of course you can at times get a fantastic deal on used boats from private parties. As for the 3.0, again compared to the BL, it's pretty decent but a 4.3 in the used market isn't that much more $ but has 50% more hp, a ton more torque and will net you similar fuel efficiency because the larger engine works less.
 

zagger

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Sep 8, 2010
Messages
191
Re: 2005 Sea Ray 180 Sport, Positives & Negatives

3.0L when proped right will not have problems with tubes etc. This is what among others I used to pull with mine:
IMG_0224.jpg

IMG_0227.jpg

Aquarium029.jpg

Congrats on your new boat, have lots of fun.
 

philipp10

Seaman
Joined
Aug 8, 2012
Messages
61
Re: 2005 Sea Ray 180 Sport, Positives & Negatives

I live in a state where we have nothing to do but go boating with our 11,000+ lakes. Everyone has a boat and they are under 20 feet so as to fit in the garage. Here you don't upgrade to a larger boat but to a higher end boat of the same size. I've also been boating for 38 years QUOTE]

I happen to live in Minnesota too and this is my 2 cents on why I picked the Sea Ray 180 Sport. First off, I agree with you that the 180 Sport is a bit spartan, but that is what I like about it. I got the version with the 2 pedestal seats and the non-bench seat style. I like that open feel of the passenger area. Lots of floor space for a small boat that I can add cargo nets etc. We don't even run with the snap in carpet. So I guess you could say, my preference in a boat is to NOT have all kinds of padding and cushioning all over like some boats do. The Sea Ray without the carpet and the pedestal seats has more of a fishing boat feel than a recreational ski boat.

Now on to the motor. I have the 3.0L and I feel it has plenty of power and what I really like is the fuel efficiency. I hear comments that the 4.3L does just as well. Well that depends upon at what speed you are running. At cruise, yes the 4.3 and the 3.0 are similar however, if you look at a typical day of boating, your not running at cruise all the time. We boat on the St. Croix river and with the no wake zones and my desire to just putter around, I would guess we are at cruise speed no more than a third of the time. At 1000 rpm, the 4.3L will do about 3.2 mpg, the 3.0L does 9.0 mpg. During a typical day of boating the 3.0L will use approximately 1/2 the gas. I know this to be true from asking my friends with their 4.3L boats.

The other bonus with the Sea Ray 180 sport is its size. The boat is only 84 inches wide as opposed to most of the competition which is at around 90 inches. It weighs just 2100 lb as opposed to around 2600-2800 lb for it's larger competition. Now of course, that has its negatives in reduced floor space but also means the 3.0L is ideally suited for this boat. The 3.0L weighs 235 lbs less that the 4.3L. So put that all together and if you want a boat that has enough power yet gets good mileage, this is a great choice. If however you need more floor space, I would agree the 4.3L in a larger boat makes more sense.

I keep reading forums where everyone is spouting off about boat quality. My take is, at the low end such as this boat, there really is very little difference once you get past the lowest end of the range. Boats are just a collection of plastic molded parts, upholstery, windshields and engines and there isn't really much to them. As long as the basic hull is built well, most of the rest of the parts come from the same third party vendors anyway. Heck, even the windshield and all the gauges on my boat is not being made by Sea Ray. So unless a manufacturer does some really big blunder in the hull layout or design, I just don't see how there can be so much difference between brands.
 
Last edited:

Chris1956

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Mar 25, 2004
Messages
28,580
Re: 2005 Sea Ray 180 Sport, Positives & Negatives

That boat is a pretty nice choice. I had an '88 19' SR Sorrento, for lots of years. A couple of observations, from experience. The 4.3LV6 motor would be better than that IL4, as it will give you much better power and smoothness. My SR bowrider could hold 8-9 adults. That 4.3L could pull a skier, with that boatload of people. Of course, it handled like a barge under those circumstances.

A 150HP outboard would free up significant amounts of interior space that is used by the motor box. Take a good look at the interior and imagine adults and kids getting on/off the boat and the tube.
 

agallant80

Commander
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
2,328
Re: 2005 Sea Ray 180 Sport, Positives & Negatives

Some of your issues have something to do with your current boat being a 89. Whats that 25 years old? As for the searay its all about condition and how well it was taken care of. I would not be afraid to buy the boat if everything checked out.
 

JASinIL2006

Vice Admiral
Joined
Feb 10, 2012
Messages
5,749
Re: 2005 Sea Ray 180 Sport, Positives & Negatives

This is a thread from 2011... OP has one post (the one that started the thread) since he joined. I'm guessing he's moved on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top