Montauk vs Trophy 1703

rbruce63

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Aug 30, 2003
Messages
212
Hi, I've been boating for a couple of years in a Boston Whaler Sport 11 dingy powered with a Chrysler 20 outboard from 1969. I've been happy with my set up however, I feel that venturing into the river bars is quite challenging not the least to say dangerous. Towing this boat with my GMC Jimmy is a breeze, however, our roads are narrow, filled with potholes and hard on the towing vehicle transmission. There are now boat ramps nor marinas, in fact we are in the third world when it comes to boating. <br /><br />I've been a Whaler fan since I was a kid when my father had a tri-hull that I believed was a Boston Whaler. The motor was the only thing left of these early ages. I was a curious kid and decided to pour oil into the carburetor and spark plugs of the motor, perhaps this saved it from seizing also it was kept inside.<br /><br /> My father had a cottage close to the river mouth of the Tarcoles river, the second largest river that drains the Central valley where the capital city of San José is located. In the 1970's the place was mystical albeit remote. We had to cross the river in a wire pulled barge. There where no paved roads, the river changed its course and destroyed the property of many of the residents of this paradise. Fishing was unbelievable. We eat Corvina (sea bass or rooster fish) every weekend. My father took us every single weekend and he had to change cars every couple of years because they were destroyed! My father is still with us and remembers these day's with fondness and a couple of tears fall from his eyes! I would like my son to have this outdoor experience also.<br /><br />My father had no trailer and boating was dangerous. The cottage and boat where sold but the motor stayed in our garage until three years ago that I rescued it and found a Boston Whaler boat which had a max rated horsepower of 20 Hp. Yes a boat for my Chrysler 20! That the boat needed to be rebuilt was no problem, I found the boat and I had to put some money aside and slowly make the restoration... We'll to make a long story short, I've used the boat in rivers, crossed the border with Nicaragua through the San Juan river and ventured in their territory, with permission of course and in our artificial lakes that are dangerous to say the least and continually claim lifes of the unexperienced. Lately my brother and I ventured into the Caribbean to do some Snook fishing but jumped three Tarpon. The outlet was very calm and fishing was thrilling. The Tarpon that we jumped where bigger than our boat.<br /><br />I have been looking into a Boston Whaler Montauk 17 or 170 of recent vintage with a two stroke Mercury 90, not my favorite motor (Evinrude E-Tec) but a good an proven motor with a good dealership and made in America, however the Trophy 1703 has caught my eye and also comes with the same motorization. The package is expensive ($25 thousand for both makes of boats), however, it can be financed and I have some savings that might put in a back to back loan to get into the water with a more sea worthy boat. I will have to sell my dingy and to justify this extravagance with my wife is going to be the toughest part.<br /><br />How is fishing with a 1703? How fuel efficient it is? What HP do you have and would you rather have more power? How good is the live well? Do you have raw water washdown included? Do you prefer the bimini top or the T top. Have any of you encountered rough sees and how did the boat fared? How far have you towed the boat?<br /><br />Many questions and I look forward for your insight!<br /><br />Regards,<br /><br />RBruce
 

cddetelich

Petty Officer 3rd Class
Joined
Oct 7, 2004
Messages
99
Re: Montauk vs Trophy 1703

If i had a choice I would buy the Boston Whaler. The Whaler, as you know, will last forever and is good in all kinds of weather/conditions. the Trophy is, I believe, a good boat to introduce into boating, but they do not have the best reputation for quality/longevity.
 

rbruce63

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Aug 30, 2003
Messages
212
Re: Montauk vs Trophy 1703

Yes, I like the Boston Whaler too. Some one at another forum said its like comparing Cadillac with Chevrolet. Well Chevy's aren't that bad. <br /><br />It seems that Bayliner has been investing in public relations with glossy brochures and testimonials about the boat's usage, construction methods and about the people that use these boats, perhaps to detach from this bad reputation that has plagued Bayliner and no longer attach the name to their Trophy boats.<br /><br />The construction methods seem up to date. The fiberglass stringer system seems to be on par with what the other boat manufacturers are using. All boats have to have flotation aids as per the USCG and this is not a monopoly of Boston Whaler which is also owned by Brunswick. <br /><br />The problem with Boston Whaler is that their dealer will not provide a good price and there is no financing available. I will try to find financing with a commercial bank just out of curiosity.<br /><br />Regards,<br /><br />RBruce
 

peterc38

Seaman
Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
59
Re: Montauk vs Trophy 1703

Not knocking trophy but in my opinion, the Whaler is a much nicer boat. Much better fit, finish and workmanship. They are not the same price here though (talking brand new), The Whaler Montauk is about $22,000 and the Trophy 1703 can be had for about $17,500 with the 90 HP 2 stroke Mercury. If you are getting them for the same price, go with the Whaler. Tough to beat the reasale value of a Whaler too.
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Montauk vs Trophy 1703

I would vote for a 80s or 90s Montauk 17 over the Montauk 170. <br /><br />That is a "classic" vs. "modern" decision. The difference to me is that the classic Montauk is a Dougherty design. It stayed in production, essentially unchanged, for 28 years. It was only discontinued to make room for the bigger, heavier, cheaper to build, softer riding 170. I object to calling the 170 a Montauk.<br /><br />I also object to the "Merc only" policy in selling new Whalers. My Suzuki DF70 powered '80 Montauk would stay with my son's Merc 90 powered 2000 Montauk 17 all day and use about 60% as much fuel. Ryan T now has my beloved Sunshine III and can testify to her performance and quality.<br /><br />If you like, and are willing to maintain, mahogany, an early 80s Montauk is a wonderful, versatile boat unexcelled in a small center console. If you want all fiberglass, the later version would suit you.<br /><br />Good luck. :)
 

crazy charlie

Vice Admiral
Joined
May 22, 2003
Messages
5,563
Re: Montauk vs Trophy 1703

Boston Whaler hands down no brainer.What I like better than both is a Mako.Charlie
 

Captn Dave

Petty Officer 2nd Class
Joined
Dec 5, 2001
Messages
176
Re: Montauk vs Trophy 1703

Boston Whaler will have a better resale value.<br /><br />I'm with JB. Go with one of the older Montauk's.
 

11 footer

Lieutenant
Joined
Nov 16, 2002
Messages
1,408
Re: Montauk vs Trophy 1703

An older Montauk is not only a better boat, but a better investment as well.<br /><br />A 1980's whaler really won't go down in value
 

rbruce63

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Aug 30, 2003
Messages
212
Re: Montauk vs Trophy 1703

I agree with JB et al. I will have to think about it. Indeed I like the hull design of the smirked Whaler 17'! It is similar to what I have now except fot the LOA of course!<br /><br />What about the live well and internal 37 gallon tank of the Trophy? <br /><br />Peter in Maine, both boats cost the same but the Whaler is sold here without any package nor motor. This opens the question for JB about having other motorizations, my favourite the E-Tec, but is hard then to compete dollar to dollar with the Trophy 1703 cc.<br /><br />Thanks for your candor!<br /><br />RBruce
 

rbruce63

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Aug 30, 2003
Messages
212
Re: Montauk vs Trophy 1703

JB:<br /><br />Is the classic design called also smirked and did it last until 1999 before the 170 was introduced?<br /><br />Regards,<br /><br />RBruce
 

11 footer

Lieutenant
Joined
Nov 16, 2002
Messages
1,408
Re: Montauk vs Trophy 1703

Smerked was from '76-'77 and was unchanged untill the 170 was introduced.
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Montauk vs Trophy 1703

The Dougherty 17' (smirked) hull was introduced in 1973 to replace the original Fisher design. It was used in a variety of models, the Montauk being the "top" of the line. I believe that my son bought one of the last of them in 2000.<br /><br />The "smirk" also appeared on the other hulls designed by Dougherty.<br /><br />The Dougherty touch is easy to recognise in modern Edgewater hulls
 
Top