Way Overboard........

Tyme2fish

Commander
Joined
Feb 19, 2002
Messages
2,481
Re: Way Overboard........

Zero tolerance comes from people with zero common sense.
 

bjcsc

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
1,805
Re: Way Overboard........

Rules are rules. What would the mother have said if some other kid sold some other kid a bag of Skittles that contained drugs instead of Skittles? Better yet, what if the Skittles were tainted in some way that made her son sick (or worse)? She'd be behind a giant lawsuit...and the school would be named...

He was a class officer. He should be setting an example. If not, it's appropriate that he's being made one...
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Way Overboard........

The latest trick in getting kids hooked is to flavor cocaine and disguise it as candy.

Good rule, good enforcement.
 

SgtMaj

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
1,997
Re: Way Overboard........

Rules are rules. What would the mother have said if some other kid sold some other kid a bag of Skittles that contained drugs instead of Skittles? Better yet, what if the Skittles were tainted in some way that made her son sick (or worse)? She'd be behind a giant lawsuit...and the school would be named...

Too late! :D They have already named the school in a $150mil lawsuit.

He was a class officer. He should be setting an example. If not, it's appropriate that he's being made one...

A couple things I don't understand, is why the sale of candy was banned, and why the student who sold the candy didn't receive at least as harsh of punishment. Also, what efforts did the school go to to let it be known that this was against the rules? But to some extent, I agree with you.
 

drewmitch44

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Jun 26, 2005
Messages
1,749
Re: Way Overboard........

I dont see what the problem is. He was suspended cause he broke the rules. Whats the issue? The kid needs to learn things like that. If you break the rules that is wrong. How was it to harsh? I could see that being a question if the punishment was in some way harsh. He was suspended for 1 day. How is that harsh? Are they supposed to just let it go and let the kid learn that in life people just let things go? I think that it is good that they suspended him for 1 day. It would have been too harsh if it was for 3-4 days. I just dont see how this is news at all. A kid broke the rules and he was punished for it. Thats all it is. If they gave the kid some kind of tough punishment i could see people getting upset about it but he was hardly punished. He was only suspended for 1 day. What should the punishment have been? Should they have just said "oh thats wrong that you broke the rules so good job"? Anyways i just dont understand i think the punishment was good for the rule he broke.
 

arboldt

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Aug 25, 2007
Messages
417
Re: Way Overboard........

The issue is not whether or not a rule was broken (no matter how idiotic the rule), but whether the punishment was commensurate with the 'crime.' There were many lesser punishments (perhaps confiscation, detention, school service, etc) that would have been far more appropriate. But suspension???

We don't know what the history of that principal and school administration has been. How much lunch-sharing has been permitted before this minor infraction was stomped hard with jackboots?

While doing 10 over the speed limit is indeed a crime and deserving of punishment, no one would think a prison term would be appropriate.

The best comment so far has been zero tolerance is zero common sense.
 

bjcsc

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
1,805
Re: Way Overboard........

This wasn't lunch sharing. Did you read the article? Did you read the part about how the students were repeatedly made aware of and warned about the strictness of this policy? How about the part about kids inadvertently buying things they may be allergic to? The student wasn't expelled...he was suspended for ONE DAY and lost his position in student government. You view this as "stomped hard"? Expelling him and not allowing him to graduate would be stomping him hard.

This is about school being a place to learn. Do you really think that in addition to having to be babysitters for 50% of the kids that are there that they should also create some type of internal school court system in order to consider mitigating circumstances for blatant disregard of school policies?

That kid, in spite of missing his awards banquet and acrylic trophy, learned a cheap and valuable life lesson...
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Way Overboard........

In case you missed it:

The latest technique for gettin kids HOOKED ON COCAINE is to flavor it and DISGUISE IT AS CANDY.

A good rule, and zero tolerance is appropriate.
 

Coors

Captain
Joined
Dec 8, 2006
Messages
3,367
Re: Way Overboard........

Ambulance chasers couldn't find an ambulance to get rich off of...
 

oops!

Supreme Mariner
Joined
Oct 18, 2007
Messages
12,932
Re: Way Overboard........

In case you missed it:

The latest technique for gettin kids HOOKED ON COCAINE is to flavor it and DISGUISE IT AS CANDY.


if i ever caught a drug dealer doing that.............

you guys would have to bail me outta jail....!!!!!!!!!!!

then id go after his buddies...
 

arboldt

Chief Petty Officer
Joined
Aug 25, 2007
Messages
417
Re: Way Overboard........

This wasn't lunch sharing. Did you read the article? Did you read the part about how the students were repeatedly made aware of and warned about the strictness of this policy? How about the part about kids inadvertently buying things they may be allergic to? The student wasn't expelled...he was suspended for ONE DAY and lost his position in student government. You view this as "stomped hard"? Expelling him and not allowing him to graduate would be stomping him hard.

This is about school being a place to learn. Do you really think that in addition to having to be babysitters for 50% of the kids that are there that they should also create some type of internal school court system in order to consider mitigating circumstances for blatant disregard of school policies?

That kid, in spite of missing his awards banquet and acrylic trophy, learned a cheap and valuable life lesson...

One of the tenets of our way of life is progressive discipline, and that disciplinary measures should fit the crime. There are many, many, disciplinary steps that could and must be taken before a suspension. Perhaps you should re-read my posting... we don't know what behavior was tolerated before this incident. *If* lunch-sharing is tolerated (and in what district in the country doesn't it happen?) then what other activities have been tolerated in the past despite authoritarian posturing?

There seems to be concern about kids getting something that might spark an allergic reaction. From personal experience, any kid with an allergy like that knows it and knows enough to avoid the problem -- especially by the time he's in high school like this. There is one food I avoid because I prefer breathing. If I'm exposed to it, I can't blame anyone else. I've learned to ask if it's an ingredient.

As for drug-dusting of candy, I suppose that may be a concern but that issue wasn't raised in this case -- only in this forum by those not involved with it. So I have to believe it wasn't an issue there.

Now consider what I was really asking. Is the punishment really commensurate with the crime? I'm not saying the kid should have gotten off scott-free, but was that level of punishment appropriate?

1) If you were to knowingly use your company's property and resources for non-company pruposes (like posting to this form), should *you* be suspended for a day?
2) If you knowingly break the law... like going more than 10 mph over the limit .. should you do prison time?
3) What are your feelings regarding Islamic Sharia Law? Do you feel it proper to cut off someone's hand for first-time petty theft? Do you feel execution is appropriate for a divorcee to sleep with a man other than her former husband?

If you feel those levels of punishment -- even for admitedly breaking the law -- are not appropriate, then I urge you to consider that principal's punishment also inappropriately harsh when there were many lesser alternatives.

That's the logic you're proposing. Break the rules, suffer harsh consequences.
 

bjcsc

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
1,805
Re: Way Overboard........

Well again one of the problems with sorting this out is our very different definitions of "harsh punishments". You're analogies are all extreme and as such are impossible to apply. I just don't see the schools reaction as harsh by any means. Stern - yes, but stern is good. We'll just end up respectfully disagreeing on that...

Now what I can tell you is that when I was in high school, I was a member of student government for 3 years and was President of my senior class. One of the stipulations of being a class officer was strict adherence to school policies. A single transgression would result in you losing your office. Class Officers were held to higher standards than everybody else (in general) as we were expected to set the example. While it's not clear in this case, I would find it easy to believe that that kid's school had a similar policy. I just have a hard time buying in to your "babysitting" mentality. The sooner we teach our children that there are consequences to their actions the better.

Assuming suspension to be the maximum punishment as you do, who do you propose will mete out your progressive discipline? School court?

1) If you were to knowingly use your company's property and resources for non-company pruposes (like posting to this forum), should *you* be suspended for a day?
If the company I worked for had a policy stating that use of "company's property and resources for non-company purposes" would result in suspension for a day and I violated it and was suspended for a day and I would see that as a no-brainer. (Fortunately as an owner I can cruise iboats whenever I want:D)
2) If you knowingly break the law... like going more than 10 mph over the limit .. should you do prison time?
Again, you're really reaching with this. Answer: Of course not, but should you expect the punishment that the law describes (like a fine)? Absolutely!
3) What are your feelings regarding Islamic Sharia Law? Do you feel it proper to cut off someone's hand for first-time petty theft? Do you feel execution is appropriate for a divorcee to sleep with a man other than her former husband?
My feelings about it are irrelevant. It's not about feelings. This is completely objective. Ignorance of the law is no excuse for violating it. Those people know their laws and to violate them and not expect the prescribed punishment is absurd.

Here's an extreme analogy like the ones you've been presenting:
Have you ever used a wood chipper? Ever seen the sign that says not to put your hand in the feed chute? Have you ever known one person that got slapped by the machine the first time they put their hand in the chute, lost only the tip of a finger the second time, etc.?

Let's pretend that you were the principal. Your rules state that violation of the candy policy results in a one-day suspension from school and any associated events and your Class Officers are subject to removal for violating any school policy. All of your students have been repeatedly informed and are aware of the rules. This same incident happens. What would you do?

BTW, although we're still working on getting you to see it my way :D, I can't tell you how great it is to have this kind of conversation on this board again. We've been talking about butterflies for a long time. I appreciate the dialogue!
 

SgtMaj

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
1,997
Re: Way Overboard........

In case you missed it:

The latest technique for gettin kids HOOKED ON COCAINE is to flavor it and DISGUISE IT AS CANDY.

A good rule, and zero tolerance is appropriate.

Wait, you mean they still push cocaine? That is so... retro.
 

JB

Honorary Moderator Emeritus
Joined
Mar 25, 2001
Messages
45,907
Re: Way Overboard........

Cocaine is the intro to crack, SgtMaj, and crack is the intro to crystal meth, the most dangerous and deadly drug (so far).

I obviously don't know that candy cocaine was the reason for the policy, and the Skittles were probably legit, but I do know people who have lost their "A" student children to drugs. . .not just fried brains but DEAD children.

A one day suspension, even if it was a day that included special events, was a slap on the wrist.
 

waterinthefuel

Commander
Joined
Nov 15, 2003
Messages
2,728
Re: Way Overboard........

In case you missed it:

The latest technique for gettin kids HOOKED ON COCAINE is to flavor it and DISGUISE IT AS CANDY.

A good rule, and zero tolerance is appropriate.

JB, they didn't say it wasn't ok to have candy, just sell it. So you're saying its ok for the kid who originally had it to eat it? If so, it should be ok for all kids.
 

SgtMaj

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
1,997
Re: Way Overboard........

Cocaine is the intro to crack, SgtMaj, and crack is the intro to crystal meth, the most dangerous and deadly drug (so far).

No no no... Cigarettes are the intro to Marijuana, which is the intro to Crack. If you can't afford crack, then you do meth (hence it's called the poor man's crack), and if you're super-rich and don't do crack or meth, then you MIGHT do coke. But coke isn't a gateway drug, it's also loads more expensive than crack is now. Unless coke has made a comeback in popularity now... but most teens aren't going to sit around a mirror with a razor blade and straw to do drugs. They want something portable they can smoke. Oh, and huffing is supposedly making a comeback with the kids, which definately leads straight to meth. I'm not sure whatever happened to extasy, it used to be popular for a while, but I guess too many kids dies from first time exposure; you don't hear much about extasy anymore.
 

bjcsc

Lieutenant Commander
Joined
Jun 1, 2006
Messages
1,805
Re: Way Overboard........

JB, they didn't say it wasn't ok to have candy, just sell it. So you're saying its ok for the kid who originally had it to eat it? If so, it should be ok for all kids.

You're missing it. Drug dealers don't make any money if they bring their products into a school and consume them themselves!
 

rolmops

Vice Admiral
Joined
Feb 24, 2002
Messages
5,512
Re: Way Overboard........

I think that JB went way overboard with the cocaine thing.Yes there is that potential,but reading the article,it was not a risk in this case.As for one day detention....I would have seen it as bonus and I would have gone fishing...
 
Top