Ski Nautique vs Mastercraft

jimmyjohn

Cadet
Joined
Jul 25, 2002
Messages
8
My son and his friends are agressive slalom skiers (not into wakeboarding) and I am considering moving from an outboard powered 17 foot Glastron to a 19-20 foot ski boat. My budget constraints slot me into a 1995-2000 model year inboard. I have been advised to buy a boat with an EFI engine. I am wondering if there is a big difference in quality and performance between the Ski Nautique and the Mastercraft? In other words, where can I get the most bang for my buck? Any help is appreciated.
 

tommays

Admiral
Joined
Jul 4, 2004
Messages
6,768
Re: Ski Nautique vs Mastercraft

You can find rock solid Correct Crafts going back before 1977 no problem
f2bec06f.jpg


The older 18' boats really sip fuel compared to the new big models

I would avoid the older Ford powered ones as there reverse rotation and a PITA to find motors :eek:


Tommays
 

Kimper

Cadet
Joined
Jul 15, 2007
Messages
26
Re: Ski Nautique vs Mastercraft

Does anyone have fuel consumption data on these boats, or know a site with it? A friend of mine wants to sell me his 2000 Air Nautique with 310hp engine.
 

4Winns2

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Nov 2, 2006
Messages
327
Re: Ski Nautique vs Mastercraft

First of all, good to hear that they ski and none of that fake wave creation for wake board jumping.

I slalomed HARD for close to 30 years. I think I've been behind every ski boat made; I made sure I had friends who were as passionate about the sport as I was. Ski boats take quite a beating. Here in central New York the season may run close to six months; and, you need a good dry or wet suit and the beggining and the end of the season to tolerate cold water temps. It sounds as though your kids are passionate about the sport as well and the boat will get a lot of use. Therefore, I suggest you pony up the money and get a name brand (Mastercraft [you'll pay for this name], Ski Nautique or Malibu) to withstand the beating it will take. I'm not saying you won't have troubles with them eventually. Most all ski boats are designed generally the same for quick hole shots and quick turns, thus the beating they incur. It's about how long the season is and the kind of hours you'll put on the boat that need factoring. Oh yeah, and what the pocket book can take. There are quite a few brands out there so your homework may take you awhile.

A word of advice from a veteran slalom skiier. Make sure the boys work out on the upper body before each season. I didn't do this every season and at 48 I'm paying the price: torn rotator cups in both shoulders with silicone injections every 6 months to withstand the daily pain. Best of luck in purchasing your ski boat. I had always wanted a Mastercraft Prostar 190 but I'll never have the shoulders or knees again to use it for what it is designed for. How I miss skiing. I've got $800.00 tied up in both my skis and there on display in my bar- -the only use they'll ever get again.
 

salty87

Commander
Joined
Aug 12, 2003
Messages
2,327
Re: Ski Nautique vs Mastercraft

there's really no answer to that question, just a brand debate. those are considered the top 2 manufacturers and have the sales numbers to prove it going back many years. there will be differences between the 2 but they'll come down to preference or taste more than performance.

like others have said though, from that time period there are others manufacturers to chose from. this is where the bang for the buck will be.


kimper- fuel consumption isn't great with an inboard. if you're loading up tanks or sacs to ride, it only gets worse. these weren't really designed with economy in mind. they have big engines to haul around a bunch of people/weight. an i/o will do much better. there's a nautique owners site if you search for it, something like nautiquefan.com
 

4Winns2

Petty Officer 1st Class
Joined
Nov 2, 2006
Messages
327
Re: Ski Nautique vs Mastercraft

there's really no answer to that question, just a brand debate. those are considered the top 2 manufacturers and have the sales numbers to prove it going back many years. there will be differences between the 2 but they'll come down to preference or taste more than performance.

like others have said though, from that time period there are others manufacturers to chose from. this is where the bang for the buck will be.


kimper- fuel consumption isn't great with an inboard. if you're loading up tanks or sacs to ride, it only gets worse. these weren't really designed with economy in mind. they have big engines to haul around a bunch of people/weight. an i/o will do much better. there's a nautique owners site if you search for it, something like nautiquefan.com

Good point on the fuel consumption, Salty. And, don't expect this kind of boat to be a speed machine despite the big gas guzzler on under the hood. They're geared down for better hole shot and top out at 45-50 mph. I know a guy on our lake who bought a new Mastercraft two weeks ago and was not happy about the lack of speed given the size of the engine. More money than brains was "working" here. Paid close to 70k for that boat- -ouch!
 

jimmyjohn

Cadet
Joined
Jul 25, 2002
Messages
8
Re: Ski Nautique vs Mastercraft

Thanks for the imput guys! I'm not concerned about top end...too many speed junkies out there already. Does anybody have experience with the Gekko's? I,ve heard it is a good value...not fancy, but a decent tow boat.
 

salty87

Commander
Joined
Aug 12, 2003
Messages
2,327
Re: Ski Nautique vs Mastercraft

gekko's, older moomba's (pre 1995 or so), really old malibu's were pretty bare bones. some are no more than the hull, engine, and 2 seats...no storage or frills. these are definitely geared toward slalom and were built before wakeboarding. one of the best pre-wakeboarding slalom boats was the supra comp.

what are you looking to do with it? how many people would you take out? what's the lake like?

most of the kids around here get into wakeboarding pretty quickly. it's odd to see someone on ski's. of course, the slalom guys are off the water by the time everyone else is getting out there.
 
Top