POINTER94 said:
Will we get a thread that says RE: Valerie Plame Wilson: I didn't get my husband his mission to Niger?
That, of course, would be promoting a lie. I really do like to look at one's track record.
Because it is irrelevant who sent her.
[colour=blue]What is relevant is
she lied and said she did not have anything to do with sending him when: SHE DID. It's called
credibility, (clearly not important in any way shape or form to you: PW2)! His mission also involved
nepotism, (that's called
motive, again not important in any way shape or form to Move-on.org Kool aid drinkers: PW2).[/colour]
The relevant facts are these:
Did the CIA send Wilson to Niger to see if Iraq was attempting to purchase Uranium from them? Yes.
[colour=blue]Ya have one fact here PW2, (that's a big deal for you).[/colour]
Did he find that out? Yes, and the answer was no.
[colour=blue]He was and is a lying idiot. He sipped tea with some of his ol' diplomat buds who denied the obvious. Only a Kool aid drinker, (avoiding any info that may potentially stimulate critical thinking) would ignore the British intel,
WHICH THEY STILL STAND BY. Wrong on both counts here PW2![/colour]
Has any evidence surfaced to suggent Wilson was incorrect? No.
[colour=blue]You are not very well informed about the bipartisan Senate's cornclusions about ol' Joe Wilson, (HINT: HE LIED)! 'Course it is different then the flavor of that Move-on.org Kool aid that you favor eh PW2?[/colour]
Did the administration try to promote the fear of a Saddam delivered "Mushroom cloud" Yes.
[colour=blue]That clearly was a risk given the history of ol' Sadam to people who cornsider facts, history/tendencies of ol' Sadam who never had a weopon he did not use on someone. That's if ya can employ critical thinkin' which seems out of yer reach: PW2[/colour].
Did Armitage, Rove, Libby all, leak to the press the identity of Valerie Plame? Yes.
[colour=blue]Two accurate facts for PW2 in one post? What's wrong here PW2, (ya better but some more in the ol' pipe).[/colour]
Did Scott McClennan when questioned say he spoke specifically to Rove and Libby about this leak, and they assured him they had nothing to do with it? Yes.
[colour=blue]Dunno 'bout this very minor point, (ya may have another worthless fact here but I dunno). Must be an important fact for Move-on.org to incourage Kool aid cornsumption[/colour].
Was that true? No.
[colour=blue]Boy yer really wrapped up in this one PW2. Unlike Tree n' Willy you lack ANY credibility so maybe you have another point wooow. What does this prove to ya PW2?[/colour]
Did President Bush specifically say he would "deal with" any in his administration involved in leaking Plame's name to the press? Yes.
[colour=blue]Yup.[/colour]
Has he "dealt" with them? Not sos anyone would notice.
[colour=blue]Is Libby still the VPs chief o' staff? Hmmmmm.[/colour]
Did Libby, at least, lie to the Grand Jury and the FBI re his involvement? A jury thought so
[colour=blue]Looks like it. So what: if he is a fool?[/colour]
Those are the relevant facts in this case.
[colour=blue]Releveant to who: PW2? Kool aid drinkers?[/colour]