I ordered the U-joint bellows to replace the old broken part. This is an OEM part #816431A 1, by Quicksilver. My boat numbers are: 1993 4.3LX/V6 serial number 0F0244564; the transom is 0F058634; the drive is 0D886515 (Alpha One Gen II).
But when I looked at the part, I realized that it is somewhat different from the old part that I removed. Namely, the old part has a rectangular ridge that goes into the rectangular groove in the bell housing. However, the new part has a rounded ridge!
It will probably fit (I can try), but I wanted to know what experts think about this. Is this a wrong part, or this is just a newer version?
I could imagine that the rectangular ridge would hold the bellows in place slightly better, but the rounded ridge would be easier to install. Can it be that Merc modified this part to favour installation?
Note: The gimbal housing has a rounded groove, and both old and new bellows have a rounded ridge on that other side, no problem. The difference is only on the bell side. Strange...
Thanks!
But when I looked at the part, I realized that it is somewhat different from the old part that I removed. Namely, the old part has a rectangular ridge that goes into the rectangular groove in the bell housing. However, the new part has a rounded ridge!
It will probably fit (I can try), but I wanted to know what experts think about this. Is this a wrong part, or this is just a newer version?
I could imagine that the rectangular ridge would hold the bellows in place slightly better, but the rounded ridge would be easier to install. Can it be that Merc modified this part to favour installation?
Note: The gimbal housing has a rounded groove, and both old and new bellows have a rounded ridge on that other side, no problem. The difference is only on the bell side. Strange...
Thanks!
Last edited: