Sorry for the long post, but I want to give you all the details.
I have a 17' Champion Bass Boat. It's an old model (1979) that has the cockpit area set toward the rear. It has a V-150 Mercury outboard. The motor's max RPM range is 5000-5500 rpm. It seems like its happiest "cruise" range is 4000-4500.
Porpoising and turning at speed were problems. An SE Sport 300 Hydrofoil helped a lot, especially the turns. Then I installed a Piranha 4-blade prop. With the pitch choices, I could tune the RPM to run exactly 5000, or exactly 5500, using the same trim settings that I used with the old 3-blade prop. I chose the longer pitch, lower RPM.
Just as everyone promised me, I lost about 2 mph top speed. Now 46 instead of 48. Not a big deal. The 4-blade prop also greatly improved my hole shot, lowered my minimum plane speed, improved fuel economy, and lets me trim up higher without porpoising. A LOT higher.
Which raises my questions. I know that the highest you can trim is not necessarily the most efficient setting.
Here's the scenario. On smooth water, run in a straight line and set the throttle to be running in the cruise range (about 4200), or full throttle (5000).
With all this trimming, the water speed (measured with GPS) does not change. Only the engine speed changes.
I can continue to trim up until the rooster tail is over 10 feet high. As I do, the boat wants to wander off the straight line, indicating that less than 1/4 of the hull it touching the water. About that point, the engine revs up higher yet and speed starts to drop off.
Now, a big rooster tail with 3/4 of the boat off the water looks impressive. (Just like a boat commercial on TV!) But I'm more interested in finding the most efficient trim. I can't decide.
Is it just before or just after the point where engine speed increases? Is the engine more efficient when the prop has a more solid bite, and the engine is slower but pushing harder? Or is it when the prop loses a bit of bite, and the engine is turning a little faster from less load? Or maybe the prop isn't losing any bite at all, and the engine speed increase is from less water contact on the hull? If the water speed changed, it would be easier to decide, but speed remains the same.
Rougher water causes porpoising, and the adjustment is easy. But in the early morning, when the water is glassy all the way from the ramp to the fishing hole....
I have a 17' Champion Bass Boat. It's an old model (1979) that has the cockpit area set toward the rear. It has a V-150 Mercury outboard. The motor's max RPM range is 5000-5500 rpm. It seems like its happiest "cruise" range is 4000-4500.
Porpoising and turning at speed were problems. An SE Sport 300 Hydrofoil helped a lot, especially the turns. Then I installed a Piranha 4-blade prop. With the pitch choices, I could tune the RPM to run exactly 5000, or exactly 5500, using the same trim settings that I used with the old 3-blade prop. I chose the longer pitch, lower RPM.
Just as everyone promised me, I lost about 2 mph top speed. Now 46 instead of 48. Not a big deal. The 4-blade prop also greatly improved my hole shot, lowered my minimum plane speed, improved fuel economy, and lets me trim up higher without porpoising. A LOT higher.
Which raises my questions. I know that the highest you can trim is not necessarily the most efficient setting.
Here's the scenario. On smooth water, run in a straight line and set the throttle to be running in the cruise range (about 4200), or full throttle (5000).
- If I trim up to where the steering becomes light and easy, there is virtually no rooster tail. Only the rear 1/2 of the hull is touching the water. (This was as good as it would get with a 3-blade prop.)
- Trim up until the rooster tail is the same height as the motor. At this point, only the rear 1/3 of the hull is touching the water.
- Trim up higher, and the RPM's increase about 300. Only the rear 1/4 of the hull is touching the water.
With all this trimming, the water speed (measured with GPS) does not change. Only the engine speed changes.
I can continue to trim up until the rooster tail is over 10 feet high. As I do, the boat wants to wander off the straight line, indicating that less than 1/4 of the hull it touching the water. About that point, the engine revs up higher yet and speed starts to drop off.
Now, a big rooster tail with 3/4 of the boat off the water looks impressive. (Just like a boat commercial on TV!) But I'm more interested in finding the most efficient trim. I can't decide.
Is it just before or just after the point where engine speed increases? Is the engine more efficient when the prop has a more solid bite, and the engine is slower but pushing harder? Or is it when the prop loses a bit of bite, and the engine is turning a little faster from less load? Or maybe the prop isn't losing any bite at all, and the engine speed increase is from less water contact on the hull? If the water speed changed, it would be easier to decide, but speed remains the same.
Rougher water causes porpoising, and the adjustment is easy. But in the early morning, when the water is glassy all the way from the ramp to the fishing hole....