I may be out of line here but maybe not.
From memory: I had a 1988 115 "Direct Charged" 2 stroker. It was Mercury's modified cross flow scavenging answer to the OMC Looper for something adaptable to the engines coming off the assembly line at the time. The Charging system was similar but different, like the hole in the piston was in a different place and the 3 conventional piston rings were used rather than the 2 wedge shaped rings used with OMCs Looper. I think when Merc. did move on to Loop Charging, they adopted the wedge shape also for greater efficiency and better performance.
If your engine is of the Direct Charge type and your other pistons have holes, are they in the same place, same size? Does the piston have a (cross flow) crown or are they flat topped.....Crown used on Direct Charged and flat topped for Loopers!
Shooting from the hip, if it were my engine I wouldn't mix the two types, even if the clearances allow for it. I'd think that vibrations could/would occur due to non-uniform power pulses to the crankshaft from the different compressions????? Considering the tear down/re assembly effort and pistons/rings unable to be returned as they had been used, gaskets and such required if re-entry is required, I personally wouldn't try it. But that's your call!