Re: hp rating questions?
A newer 75 hp Yamaha, Evinrude e-tec or Mercury optimax will run circles around ANY old 85 Force motor.
I imagine you might be new to the boating game but, the 75 HP motors of today (specifically the 2 stokes) will tear up the older 85 hp motors due to power to weight ratio. They are not cheap but they do work.
Although I don't disagree with the concept, its not an apples to apples comparison. Crank hp vs prop hp. A modern 75hp powerhead is probably more like a 90 or 95hp crank. (going by the strict legal definition that everyone takes, a modern 75hp is technically violating the sticker already. The boat was rated for 85 at the crank, and a modern 75hp exceeds that. That argument is pretty much ignored though...)
Anyway....
Insurance... Every time this thread comes up, I post that I used to worked in insurance, and not once did we have a situation where engine power made any difference in who was liable, or if someone was sued because of it. NOT ONCE. I've challenged people to come back with documented proof otherwise, not 'heard from a friend' stories.. Haven't seen anything yet, so take it for what its worth.
And finally, although some states have laws regarding overpowering, many don't. There is no federal law preventing the OWNER from putting a larger engine on, the sticker is what the manufacturer has to abide by. There is a throttle control for a reason. And weight is also not a driving factor, as its entirely possible to drop a larger engine on that is lighter than what was on the boat previously. (and its also entirely possible to install a smaller HP engine, and end up quite a bit heavier than OEM. (4 stroke...)
So for the guys that say overpowering is bad, any of you drive a diesel truck? Any of you have a diesel programmer, that potentially doubles the horsepower and torque? Anyone see a problem with this?