Get-it-Wet
Cadet
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2010
- Messages
- 25
I just ran across an article that told me not to use PT Plywood. Another article told me that it was the best to use. What is the better plywood to use: pressure treated or non-pressure treated?
Unlike some, I recommend dry PT plywood for decks and dry dimentional PT lumber for stringers. You will likely need to dry the lumber yourself, since it is sold very moist.
I believe I have a sound reason for my recommendations. Solid PT lumber is much more rot resistant than exterior plywood, and plenty strong enough for stringers. Also if the new plywood stringers ever get wet, they will quickly rot and fall apart, and the reason we are replacing them is that the original stringers did get wet. What makes you think you can waterproof the replacements better than the original builder, who was working with new dry fiberglass and did the original monolythic lay up?
I also would rather have a PT plywood transom for the same reason. Although new PT plywood is a bit weaker than new Marine plywood, non-rotten PT plywood is much stronger than any rotten Marine plywood. If any water penetrates the marine plywood, it will start to rot. This always happens when the transom bolts are installed, despite your use of silicone, some water will always get in. PT plywood will not rot for a long time, even if it gets wet.....
That is the common pressure treated ply found at the local lumber yard. http://www.glen-l.com/wood-plywood/boatbuilding-plywood.htmlFor BEST performance of plywood in boat manufacturing, APA recommends the use of treated plywood according to the following specification.
Treated in accordance with AWPA Standard C9 with < CCA, ACQ, ACZA or ACA> to 0.40 pcf retention. Kiln dry after treating (KDAT) to 18% or less.
http://www.glen-l.com/wood-plywood/fiberglass-plywood.htmlThe influence of the treatment and moisture content on fiberglass bondability was assessed by two measured results:
All tests on the untreated and treated specimens at the 65% relative humidity failed predominately in the plywood, indicating a good fiberglass bond. This indicates that the treatment did not have an adverse effect on bonding at this moisture level. Furthermore, the strength of the treated and untreated plywood were similar.
- Whether failure occurred in the plywood or at the fiberglass/plywood interface
- The load at which failure occurred
The effect of the 90% relative humidity led to some failures at the plywood/fiberglass interface indicating poor bond. This occurred for some untreated and treated plywood types.
http://www.glen-l.com/wood-plywood/marine-plywood.htmlMarine-grade plywood is not treated with any chemicals to enhance its resistance to decay. If decay is a concern, it should be pressure-preservative treated to an appropriate standard.
Since we now know you are working on a fiberglass boat....... PT will be somewhat safe..... needs to be really dried out a bit before resins will properly (and permanently) adhere to it.