Re: Ideas about placement of new foam
Thanks foodfisher...here's some of the things im wondering about, should i slice them lengthwise to flatten them so i can get better compaction or should they be left whole?
I'm trying to make the same decision as the OP. I pulled the deck from my 16' Lund Rebel, yesterday. Each space between the ribs is packed full of poured-in foam.
Issue:
Water displacement is what we use to measure floatation material. Let's imagine a hypothetical "noodle" that is square in cross section, 3" on a side and 6' long. The square noodle could be tapered on the ends to match the hull curvature, and would pack well enough in the square-sided areas between ribs of my boat that I could probably get close to matching the volume of foam I remove.
-Round hollow 3" diameter, 6' long noodles have a volume of ~ 0.262 cubic feet.
-The square cross section noodle (3"x3"x6') has a volume of 0.375 cubic feet.
-The volume displacement difference between square noodle and hollow round noodle is 30%!
-The difference between the volume of the original poured-in foam, and round-hollow noodles placed whole in the same space is at least 30%.
I can't use "pink foam" insulation sheets for floatation. I have tested the pink, it melts in gasoline. Given the small chance of a fuel spill or leak in the boat, and direct flow to the under-deck foam, it is not worth the risk. So, back to the OP's second post, maybe slicing up the hollow noodles lengthwise would be a way to reduce the loss of flotation volume. (And increase amount of project effort 10X.)
I have seen polyethelene swimming mats. Same stuff as the noodles, just various shapes of 1" thick material. Anyone know of a source for the mats? I have not seen hexagonal or solid noodles available in stores for a few years. A solid round noodle would have 11% more displacement than a hollow (and not trap water.)
Question: Any other alternatives not mentioned? Looking for polyethelene material, which does not melt in gasoline.