Thunder craft
Recruit
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2007
- Messages
- 3
First of all, many thanks for all the help you have already given me, I have searched and read everything and anything I could find on here related to this motor and I owe you all for it.
I have a 15 ft Thundercraft ski boat, looks like a small Sidewinder. It came with a 1979 100 hp crossflow that needed a piston (light score, .020 should clean it up nicely) I threw on a 1975 85 hp crossflow that I had for the summer and am rebuilding the 100.
This is a ski boat and is used primarily for pulling skiiers/wakeboard/tubing. Since I have to rebuild it anyways, I am looking to try and build a good solid skiing motor out of it. Here is what I am thinking, I would appreciate some opinions from seasoned experts. I am not really looking for top end as much as a solid snap and a motor that will idle happy and run nice at part throttle when pulling a skiier.
- Keep the small 100hp carbs for better snap
- Wiseco pistons, bore the block .020 in all holes
- Use stock heads
- Boyesen reeds
- Bubble back exhaust cover to increase breathing
Here are my questions:
- Is it worth it to port the cylinders to 140 port profiles? Is this something that can be done with a dremel? Is this doable without too much headaches, or should I just find a late 70's 115/140 block? Where would I find the desired port profiles, should I just find a blown 140 block and measure from that (they aren't very common up here)?.
- Would the motor benefit from opening up the intake in the manner described by Dhadley (plenum)? I am thinking that increased RPM range (6500-6800) would be nice as this boat usually runs a short prop (15") for torque and getting 45+ out of that setup without changing props would be very nice, just for getting home.
- Is the bubble back modification worth the trouble of finding the housing?
Any comments? Thanks in advance.
I know I would probably be better served by finding a good used looper but this type of thing is fun to me and it's a lot cheaper. The lower unit is good and the motor is pretty clean. I suspect it blew up due to carbon as it was a gooey mess. The 21 pitch prop I found on there (and the abundance of ski rope) tell me that this poor thing spent most of it's time at or under 3K, pulling hard. The 85, with a 15 pitch prop, runs great right now.
I have a 15 ft Thundercraft ski boat, looks like a small Sidewinder. It came with a 1979 100 hp crossflow that needed a piston (light score, .020 should clean it up nicely) I threw on a 1975 85 hp crossflow that I had for the summer and am rebuilding the 100.
This is a ski boat and is used primarily for pulling skiiers/wakeboard/tubing. Since I have to rebuild it anyways, I am looking to try and build a good solid skiing motor out of it. Here is what I am thinking, I would appreciate some opinions from seasoned experts. I am not really looking for top end as much as a solid snap and a motor that will idle happy and run nice at part throttle when pulling a skiier.
- Keep the small 100hp carbs for better snap
- Wiseco pistons, bore the block .020 in all holes
- Use stock heads
- Boyesen reeds
- Bubble back exhaust cover to increase breathing
Here are my questions:
- Is it worth it to port the cylinders to 140 port profiles? Is this something that can be done with a dremel? Is this doable without too much headaches, or should I just find a late 70's 115/140 block? Where would I find the desired port profiles, should I just find a blown 140 block and measure from that (they aren't very common up here)?.
- Would the motor benefit from opening up the intake in the manner described by Dhadley (plenum)? I am thinking that increased RPM range (6500-6800) would be nice as this boat usually runs a short prop (15") for torque and getting 45+ out of that setup without changing props would be very nice, just for getting home.
- Is the bubble back modification worth the trouble of finding the housing?
Any comments? Thanks in advance.
I know I would probably be better served by finding a good used looper but this type of thing is fun to me and it's a lot cheaper. The lower unit is good and the motor is pretty clean. I suspect it blew up due to carbon as it was a gooey mess. The 21 pitch prop I found on there (and the abundance of ski rope) tell me that this poor thing spent most of it's time at or under 3K, pulling hard. The 85, with a 15 pitch prop, runs great right now.