ted655
Petty Officer 1st Class
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2003
- Messages
- 252
:devil:Go here for the whole story:
Sorry for the cut & paste.
>
> http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/64
>
>
> Now: US Citizens to be Required ''Clearance'' to Leave USA
> International Politics October 26, 2006 Forget no-fly lists.
>
> If Uncle Sam gets its way, beginning on Jan. 14, 2007, we'll all be on
> no-fly lists, unless the government gives us permission to leave-or
> re-enter-the United States.
>
> The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (HSA) has proposed that all
> airlines, cruise lines-even fishing boats-be required to obtain
> clearance for each passenger they propose taking into or out of the
> United States.
>
> It doesn't matter if you have a U.S. Passport - a "travel document"
> that now, absent a court order to the contrary, gives you a virtually
> unqualified right to enter or leave the United States, any time you want.
>
> When the DHS system comes into effect next January, if the agency says
> "no" to a clearance request, or doesn't answer the request at all, you
> won't be permitted to enter-or leave-the United States.
>
>
>
> Go here for the whole story:
>
> http://www.ibinews.com/ibinews/newsdesk/20060814154923ibinews.html
>
> In a rather bizarre ruling that has marine industry officials worried,
> Judge Robert G. James of the United States District Court, Western
> Division of Louisiana, has said that it is criminal trespass for the
> American boating public to boat, fish, or hunt on the Mississippi
> River and other navigable waters in the US.
>
> In the case of Normal Parm v. Sheriff Mark Shumate, James ruled that
> federal law grants exclusive and private control over the waters of
> the river, outside the main shipping channel, to riparian landowners.
> The shallows of the navigable waters are no longer open to the public.
> That, in effect, makes boating illegal across most of the country.
>
> "Even though this action seems like a horrible pre-April fools joke,
> it is very serious," said Phil Keeter, MRAA president, in a statement.
> "Because essentially all the waters and waterways of our country are
> considered navigable in the US law, this ruling declares recreational
> boating, water skiing, fishing, waterfowl hunting, and fishing
> tournaments to be illegal and the public subject to jail sentences for
> recreating with their families."
>
> Last month, James rejected the findings of the Magistrate judge who
> found earlier that the American public had the right under federal law
> and Louisiana law to navigate, boat, fish, and hunt on the waters of
> the Mississippi river up to the normal high water line of the river.
> Judge James Kirk relied on the long established federal principles of
> navigation that recognized the public navigational rights " entitles
> the public to the reasonable use of navigable waters for all
> legitimate purposes of travel or transportation, for boating, sailing
> for pleasure, as well as for carrying persons or property for hire,
> and in any kind of watercraft the use of which is consistent with
> others also enjoying the right possessed in common."
>
>
>
>
>
>
Sorry for the cut & paste.
>
> http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/64
>
>
> Now: US Citizens to be Required ''Clearance'' to Leave USA
> International Politics October 26, 2006 Forget no-fly lists.
>
> If Uncle Sam gets its way, beginning on Jan. 14, 2007, we'll all be on
> no-fly lists, unless the government gives us permission to leave-or
> re-enter-the United States.
>
> The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (HSA) has proposed that all
> airlines, cruise lines-even fishing boats-be required to obtain
> clearance for each passenger they propose taking into or out of the
> United States.
>
> It doesn't matter if you have a U.S. Passport - a "travel document"
> that now, absent a court order to the contrary, gives you a virtually
> unqualified right to enter or leave the United States, any time you want.
>
> When the DHS system comes into effect next January, if the agency says
> "no" to a clearance request, or doesn't answer the request at all, you
> won't be permitted to enter-or leave-the United States.
>
>
>
> Go here for the whole story:
>
> http://www.ibinews.com/ibinews/newsdesk/20060814154923ibinews.html
>
> In a rather bizarre ruling that has marine industry officials worried,
> Judge Robert G. James of the United States District Court, Western
> Division of Louisiana, has said that it is criminal trespass for the
> American boating public to boat, fish, or hunt on the Mississippi
> River and other navigable waters in the US.
>
> In the case of Normal Parm v. Sheriff Mark Shumate, James ruled that
> federal law grants exclusive and private control over the waters of
> the river, outside the main shipping channel, to riparian landowners.
> The shallows of the navigable waters are no longer open to the public.
> That, in effect, makes boating illegal across most of the country.
>
> "Even though this action seems like a horrible pre-April fools joke,
> it is very serious," said Phil Keeter, MRAA president, in a statement.
> "Because essentially all the waters and waterways of our country are
> considered navigable in the US law, this ruling declares recreational
> boating, water skiing, fishing, waterfowl hunting, and fishing
> tournaments to be illegal and the public subject to jail sentences for
> recreating with their families."
>
> Last month, James rejected the findings of the Magistrate judge who
> found earlier that the American public had the right under federal law
> and Louisiana law to navigate, boat, fish, and hunt on the waters of
> the Mississippi river up to the normal high water line of the river.
> Judge James Kirk relied on the long established federal principles of
> navigation that recognized the public navigational rights " entitles
> the public to the reasonable use of navigable waters for all
> legitimate purposes of travel or transportation, for boating, sailing
> for pleasure, as well as for carrying persons or property for hire,
> and in any kind of watercraft the use of which is consistent with
> others also enjoying the right possessed in common."
>
>
>
>
>
>