[zeag04]

I'm about to buy a bay boat at the Houston bost show. I'd appreciate feedback on the Yamaha 200 HPDI fuel injected vs. the carburetor. I realize there's an efficiency difference, what about performance and problems? Any comments on the VMAX versus the standard HPDI 200?

[DJ]

The injected unit will save you some operating money-fuel, in the long run. There are other benefits too: easier starting and warm up, smoother idling, less smoke.The downsides are basically complexity. Don't figure that you can diagnose and repair running problems with this unit yourself, unless you are set up to do so.I haven't heard of problems in general with any of the HPDI units. Nothing in particular stands out.I would closely check out the dealers credentials to service the more hi-tech. product.The resale values will probably be a wash dollar for dollar invested.I would go with the V-Max for a bass boat and the standard HPDI for anything else. The resale on a bass boat with the V-Max would be better than with the other two.

[AdamBomb]

This past October, I repowered my 24' Sea Ray Laguna, Adam Bomb II, with a 2001 Yamaha OX66 250HP outboard. I replaced twin Mercury 135HP engines that were on the boat. I couldn't be happier with the Yamaha. I just pulled the boat and winterized it two days ago. Since October 30th, I have put 130 hours on it and the engine has been terrific. I would recommend Yamaha to anyone. As per your question, I would recommend going with the direct injected motor over the carburated engine. My engine features the OX66 fuel injection, not HPDI. There is a difference, and the engines are two different model lines. OX66 is a little older than the HPDI, and not quite as economical. However, it is slightly less expensive and features all the benefits of fuel injection: smooth idle, instant starts, low smoke, quiet, and fuel efficient. Go with an injected motor...you won't be sorry.Tight lines,Adam

[zeag04]

Thanks all - you confirmed my choice - injected.