Please note this thread has been inactive for 90 days. For the best results, please start a new thread.
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Cadet
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    arkansas
    Posts
    21

    Default Fuel consumption vs. RPM

    Now this may need to be redirected to the engine gurus, but here goes. In a carburated engine, at wot, when we see rpms decrease due to the increase in drop pitch, do we see a decrease in gph? I'm trying to go for fuel econ. in a prop selection. Thanks for replies.

  2. #2
    Supreme Mariner Silvertip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    25,770

    Default Re: Fuel consumption vs. RPM

    Lug the engine and you use more fuel and the engine doesn't like it at all. Prop the motor for the top of the recommended wide open throttle RPM band with normal load. Best for economy and engine longevity. This is not a car where lower engine rpm = better mileage. Outboards cannot be lugged.

  3. #3
    Cadet
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    arkansas
    Posts
    21

    Default Re: Fuel consumption vs. RPM

    So variances in rpm don't have an effect on how much fuel is drawn into the intake manifold?

  4. #4
    Admiral walleyehed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Back to Goodland, KS again
    Posts
    6,684

    Default Re: Fuel consumption vs. RPM

    Yes, it does, but picture it this way...If you run a 25 pitch prop and at WOT (butterflies wide open) and engine is turning say 4000RPM, you have a high manifold pressure/low RPM situation.OK, let's say now we are running a 19 pitch prop at 5800RPM...we have less manifold pressure/high RPM.OK, now lets back down to 25MPH, the 25P prop is requiring the butterflies to stay at 3/4-full open to maintain that speed because it is way below the torque curve..the 19P, on the other hand, shows the butterflies to be at 1/3-1/2 open because we are in the middle (or close to) the torque range, but still at 25MPH. We have more RPM with the 19, but lower manifold pressure (some will say vacume) so we are doing less work requiring less fuel.

  5. #5
    Supreme Mariner Silvertip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Midwest
    Posts
    25,770

    Default Re: Fuel consumption vs. RPM

    Yamaha has some very nice fuel consumption data on their web site in the Performance Test section. Choose any motor (2 or 4 stroke) and any boat type that they've tested. View those tests and it should become apparent how fuel economy/RPM/load/prop pitch interact.

Similar Threads

  1. Mystery: What caused excess fuel consumption / exhausting unburnt fuel?
    By Tinkerer in forum Johnson & Evinrude Outboards
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: August 15th, 2007, 07:47 PM
  2. fuel consumption
    By sumcat1 in forum Boat Topics and Questions (not engine topics)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 30th, 2005, 09:21 AM
  3. Would a richer fuel mix effect fuel consumption?
    By zdmaster2k in forum Johnson & Evinrude Outboards
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: May 13th, 2005, 11:38 AM
  4. fuel consumption
    By Bruce San in forum Johnson & Evinrude Outboards
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: April 28th, 2005, 11:49 AM
  5. Fuel consumption: 4.3 vs 5.7 vs 7.4
    By ZmOz in forum Mercruiser I/O & Inboard Engines & Outdrives
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: May 4th, 2004, 04:45 PM
  1. iboats Forum Directory - Over 100,000 forum posts organized by topic