Please note this thread has been inactive for 90 days. For the best results, please start a new thread.
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Default 1997 Johnson V4 90, the good, bad??

    Just bought a 1997 Stratos 250 with a Johnson V4 90 on it, one owner boat, compression was 115-120 on all cylinders, is the generally a reliable engine? Any quirks or problems I need to address? Thanks....

  2. #2
    Commander dozerII's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Saskatchewan Ca.
    Posts
    2,982

    Default Re: 1997 Johnson V4 90, the good, bad??

    I have a 93 v4 90 just rebuilt never been run yet. I bought it based on the way they are talked about on this forum. I had a 115 v4 on my last boat and it was great. Read the threads on the VRO and OMS systems then make a choice. Just my 2 cents
    Glen
    Glen
    1986 Starcraft SS201 current rebuild
    http://forums.iboats.com/starcraft-boats/1986-ss-201-a-543074.html
    1972 Starcraft SS18 120 Mercruiser
    My 79 18 SS rebuild http://forums.iboats.com/showthread....hlight=dozerii

  3. #3
    Captain
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Savannh Georgia
    Posts
    3,273

    Default Re: 1997 Johnson V4 90, the good, bad??

    I think the V-4 OMC motors are pretty much legendary for durability. Just do the routine maintenance, be sure to keep your oil tank filled, ( I premix), make sure it does not run hot, keep the carbs clean ( I like Sea Foam additive) and keep it above the water line, and you should be good.

  4. #4
    Lieutenant Commander
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Fl.Keys
    Posts
    1,819

    Default Re: 1997 Johnson V4 90, the good, bad??

    great engine.question, is that a 25 ft boat,BECAUSE if so,could be underpowered

  5. #5

    Default Re: 1997 Johnson V4 90, the good, bad??

    Quote Originally Posted by mikesea View Post
    great engine.question, is that a 25 ft boat,BECAUSE if so,could be underpowered
    whoops thats supposed to say Stratos 258, its 15 1/2 ft long, 890lbs dry...

  6. #6
    Supreme Mariner
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Port Charlotte FL but never the same since hurricane Charlie
    Posts
    16,977

    Default Re: 1997 Johnson V4 90, the good, bad??

    A lot depends on which 1997 90 hp you have. The crossflow is old technology but very reliable with reasonable care and maintenance. The 90 hp looper is newer technology, quick to rev up, great torque. Great motor. Both will serve you well.

  7. #7

    Default Re: 1997 Johnson V4 90, the good, bad??

    Quote Originally Posted by Dhadley View Post
    A lot depends on which 1997 90 hp you have. The crossflow is old technology but very reliable with reasonable care and maintenance. The 90 hp looper is newer technology, quick to rev up, great torque. Great motor. Both will serve you well.
    how do I tell the diffrence between the two??

  8. #8
    Supreme Mariner
    Join Date
    Feb 2001
    Location
    Port Charlotte FL but never the same since hurricane Charlie
    Posts
    16,977

    Default Re: 1997 Johnson V4 90, the good, bad??

    The crossflow will have bolt on by-pass covers and exhaust plates. The heads will have bolt on water jacket covers. The block is a 90* block.

    A 90 hp looper is a 60* block, no bolt on covers for the intake area or exhaust. The flywheel will be uner a plastic cover.

    As always, the model numer will let us "see" what you have.

  9. #9
    Petty Officer 1st Class
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    391

    Default Re: 1997 Johnson V4 90, the good, bad??

    I have an 88 spl v-4 (1996) and its a crossflow. I think the torque is great. Could only get 5200rpm with an old worn out 17" prop. Switched to SS 15" and have great hole shot and 5600+ rpms. motor is strong BUT it does like the fuel. No big deal, most trips will be under 40 miles round trip.

  10. #10
    Captain
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Savannh Georgia
    Posts
    3,273

    Default Re: 1997 Johnson V4 90, the good, bad??

    proper prop is huge....I have found many boats over propped..people think it helps the motor to turn less RPMs...most V-4s need to spin at least 5400 RPMs in my opinion...5800 is even better

Similar Threads

  1. 1997 Kaw 750 Good place for cheap parts?
    By jam1ej20 in forum PWC (Jetskis, Waverunners, etc.)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: May 9th, 2009, 07:59 AM
  2. 1997 90 HP Mercury-Good engine or bad?
    By nightstalker in forum Non-Repair Outboard Discussions
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: January 27th, 2008, 11:30 AM
  3. Yam F50 Four Stroke 1997 any good?
    By Keith Buchanan in forum Non-Repair Outboard Discussions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: December 20th, 2004, 03:47 AM
  4. 1997 force 75hp any good?
    By tazzy62 in forum Non-Repair Outboard Discussions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: September 26th, 2003, 04:48 AM
  5. Any good news about 1997-1999 FICHTs?
    By tokyouser in forum Johnson & Evinrude Outboards
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: February 3rd, 2002, 01:56 AM
  1. iboats Forum Directory - Over 100,000 forum posts organized by topic