Re: H.P. ratings for boats
I say put as much power on it as you legally can... to a POINT. I've been around power boats all my life. In my experience when you put the rated power on a boat (say, a boat rated for 125 and you put a 125 on it) it still seems under-powered.
Example: My dad once had an old boat that was rated for a crankshaft 125. At one time he had a '68 Merc 125 on it. It did okay - had enough power for skiing, but had yawnable performance at top speed. Then, he bought a propshaft rated Suzy 140 and put it on the same boat. NOW it started to become fun! Had more torque for skiing and at WOT nearly flew! Keep in mind that a propshaft rated 140 is more like 155 or160 crankshaft h.p. He effectively went from a 125 to a 160! The power difference was amazing. When you ran that boat at WOT with the engine trimmed out, it didn't throw a wake. The only thing coming out the back was prop blast. It did an easy 50 mph. With the old 125 you'd have to be going down hill somehow to reach 45. Earlier I said, "to a POINT." To me a V-6 150 or 175 would be CRAZY on that boat.
Some would say, "Isn't it dangerous to overpower a boat?" Not if you know what you're doing, and you don't WAY overpower it. And just because you have that extra power doesn't mean you have to use it. People do this all the time with cars and never think, "gee, I wonder if this is overpowered now." You have your stock '69 SS Camaro with a S.B. 350. Then you have your bored out, cammed, heads ported, huge Holley, blown, etc., '69 SS Camaro. I've never heard anyone wonder aloud if they have too much power with a car like that...
TG