Re: Big Cruisers - Roller or Bunk?
Long week, Bonz?
But I'm on your side on preferring rollers. I can't speak to which is better for a 30' boat mainly b/c I think they belong in the water or in storage on the hard, and are not "trailer boats."
For smaller boats, roller trailers used to be the ONLY way to go in salt water b/c you kept the trailer out of the water. Lake boaters started sinking trailers; manufacturers saw a cost cutting place on the rig, and started selling them under cheap boats. Now bunks are on the coast, attached to allegedly corrosion-proof trailers with allegedly rust-free water-tight parts (ha!)
The wobble rollers on my 1988 trailer have never been lubed or anything and work as good as they did new. I had one sleeve crack and a few hog ring fittings rust on the ones furthest back. However, the rear strut, the only part of the galvanized trailer to go underwater, rusted out. Rollers mean I never sink it (17' boat)
The rollers on my 1970 trailer works fine for the 13' whaler but could use some loosening up. As someone said, I can slide on them anyway. Never sink it. Replaced the springs/axle after 40 years. Whalers, BTW, must sit on keel rollers (at least old ones).
The bunks under a hunt club boat have been replaced a couple times. it's a dunker we bought for $500. Don't expect it to last. the boat, BTW, cannot sit on rollers; the hull requires bunks.
Never done anything short of hosing on my 2002 trailer and that one has to sink a little for retrieveing (I go real fast b/c it's against 50 years of "Don't sink it" echoing in my ears!). No greasing the rollers or anything. Maintenance free.
So I think the general statements that rollers are for fresh water, and require more maintenance than bunks, are both, generally, incorrect. Nothing one could prove; anecdotal evidence isn't worth much; it's all dependent.