Re: 1995 johnson 150 temp sender thread size.
What makes you feel I didn?t read the rules?
You seem to be so quick to enforce rule #12 as if it ONLY reads:
12. Please do not post to threads that have been inactive for more than 3 months UN-LESS you are the original poster.
IF that were the case, then yes, I?m guilty as charged - lol.
Ah, but then why does the rule go on to explain the rule?s basis :
.... We have very active forums and any thread that remains inactive for that long should {not must} be considered "dead". It is especially confusing when there is an entirely new question posted to an old thread. This is considered a hijack. Please start a new thread of your own.
Rule 12 is to reduce that irritating phenomenon where typically a newbie to a forum whom doesn?t understand or know how (or too lazy) to start a new thread, resurrects an old thread by re-posting their own question on-top a thread that might be somewhat similar. THAT is a thread-jack. However, my post is indeed 100% on-topic, and even directly addresses the OP - solicits a follow-up response from the OP ? neither can be constituted as a jack.
Again, nothing personal here, I don't take your "90 day thread police" reply personal either. I just wanted to point out that of all the rule 12 violations I see around here, THIS wasn't one of them.
This thread is officially nuked - Please feel free to PM me if this warrants further discussion as we are BOTH now way off-topic.